Suppr超能文献

一项美国医院对一种皮肤闭合系统与髋关节和膝关节置换术护理标准进行比较的预算影响分析。

A US hospital budget impact analysis of a skin closure system compared with standard of care in hip and knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Sadik Kay, Flener Jana, Gargiulo Jeanine, Post Zachary, Wurzelbacher Steven, Hogan Andrew, Hollmann Sarah, Ferko Nicole

机构信息

Ethicon Inc., Health Economics Market Access, Somerville, NJ, USA.

Proliance Orthopedic Associates, Renton, WA, USA.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec 17;11:1-11. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S181630. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medicare's mandatory bundle for hip and knee arthroplasty necessitates provider accountability for quality and cost of care to 90 days, and wound closure may be a key area of consideration. The DERMABOND PRINEO Skin Closure System (22 cm) combines a topical skin adhesive with a self-adhering mesh without the need for dressing changes or suture or staple removal. This study estimated the budget impact of the Skin Closure System compared to other wound closure methods for hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A 90-day economic model was developed assuming 500 annual hip/knee arthroplasties for a typical US hospital setting. In current practice, wound closure methods for the final skin layer were set to 50% sutures and 50% staples. In future practice, this distribution shifted to 20% sutures, 20% staples, and 60% Skin Closure System. Health care resources included materials (eg, staplers, steri-strips, and traditional/barbed sutures), standard or premium dressings, outpatient visits, and home care visits. An Expert Panel, comprised of three orthopedic physician assistants, two orthopedic surgeons, and a home health representative, was used to inform several model parameters. Other inputs were informed by national data or literature. Unit costs were based on list prices in 2016 US dollars. Uncertainty in the model was explored through one-way sensitivity and alternative scenario analyses.

RESULTS

The analysis predicted that use of Skin Closure System in the future practice could achieve cost savings of $56.70 to $79.62 per patient, when standard or premium wound dressings are used, respectively. This translated to an annual hospital budgetary savings ranging from $28,349 to $39,809 when assuming 500 arthroplasties. Dressing materials and postoperative health care visits were key model drivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the Skin Closure System may provide cost savings within hip and knee arthroplasties due to decreases in resource utilization in the postacute care setting.

摘要

背景

医疗保险对髋关节和膝关节置换术的强制性捆绑支付要求医疗服务提供者对90天内的护理质量和成本负责,而伤口闭合可能是一个关键的考虑领域。DERMABOND PRINEO皮肤闭合系统(22厘米)将局部皮肤粘合剂与自粘网片相结合,无需更换敷料或拆除缝线或钉合线。本研究估计了与髋关节和膝关节置换术的其他伤口闭合方法相比,皮肤闭合系统的预算影响。

方法

建立了一个90天的经济模型,假设美国一家典型医院每年进行500例髋关节/膝关节置换术。在当前实践中,最终皮肤层的伤口闭合方法设定为50%缝线和50%钉合线。在未来实践中,这种分布转变为20%缝线、20%钉合线和60%皮肤闭合系统。医疗保健资源包括材料(如钉合器、手术薄膜和传统/带倒刺缝线)、标准或优质敷料、门诊就诊和家庭护理就诊。一个由三名骨科医师助理、两名骨科外科医生和一名家庭健康代表组成的专家小组为几个模型参数提供了信息。其他输入数据来自国家数据或文献。单位成本基于2016年美元的标价。通过单因素敏感性分析和替代情景分析探讨了模型中的不确定性。

结果

分析预测,在未来实践中使用皮肤闭合系统,当分别使用标准或优质伤口敷料时,每位患者可节省成本56.70美元至79.62美元。假设进行500例置换术,这意味着每年可节省医院预算28,349美元至39,809美元。敷料材料和术后医疗保健就诊是关键的模型驱动因素。

结论

由于在急性后期护理环境中资源利用率的降低,使用皮肤闭合系统可能会在髋关节和膝关节置换术中节省成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cf0/6301301/8bfe38836b6e/ceor-11-001Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验