Suppr超能文献

抗血管生成因子药物与激光光凝治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效比较:一项纳入个体患者水平数据的网状Meta分析

An efficacy comparison of anti-vascular growth factor agents and laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: a network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient-level data.

作者信息

Muston Dominic, Korobelnik Jean-Francois, Reason Tim, Hawkins Neil, Chatzitheofilou Ismini, Ryan Fay, Kaiser Peter K

机构信息

Bayer US LLC, Whippany, NJ, USA.

Service d'ophtalmologie CHU, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-1006-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This was an updated network meta-analysis (NMA) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and laser photocoagulation in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Unlike previous NMA that used meta-regression to account for potential confounding by systematic variation in treatment effect modifiers across studies, this update incorporated individual patient-level data (IPD) regression to provide more robust adjustment.

METHODS

An updated review was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials for inclusion in a Bayesian NMA. The network included intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) 2 mg bimonthly (2q8) after 5 initial doses, ranibizumab 0.5 mg as-needed (PRN), ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend (T&E), and laser photocoagulation. Outcomes included in the analysis were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, and patients with ≥10 and ≥ 15 ETDRS letter gains/losses at 12 months. Analyses were performed using networks restricted to IPD-only and IPD and aggregate data with (i) no covariable adjustment, (ii) covariable adjustment for baseline BVCA assuming common interaction effects (against reference treatment), and (iii) covariable adjustments specific to each treatment comparison (restricted to IPD-only network).

RESULTS

Thirteen trials were included in the analysis. IVT-AFL 2q8 was superior to laser in all analyses. IVT-AFL 2q8 showed strong evidence of superiority (95% credible interval [CrI] did not cross null) versus ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN for mean change in BCVA (mean difference 5.20, 95% CrI 1.90-8.52 ETDRS letters), ≥15 ETDRS letter gain (odds ratio [OR] 2.30, 95% CrI 1.12-4.20), and ≥10 ETDRS letter loss (OR 0.25, 95% CrI 0.05-0.74) (IPD and aggregate random-effects model with baseline BCVA adjustment). IVT-AFL 2q8 was not superior to ranibizumab 0.5 mg T&E for mean change in BCVA (mean difference 5.15, 95% CrI -0.26-10.61 ETDRS letters) (IPD and aggregate random-effects model).

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA, which incorporated IPD to improve analytic robustness, showed evidence of superiority of IVT-AFL 2q8 to laser and ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN. These results were irrespective of adjustment for baseline BCVA.

摘要

背景

这是一项关于抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物与激光光凝治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者的更新网络荟萃分析(NMA)。与之前使用meta回归来解释各研究中治疗效应修饰因素的系统变异所导致的潜在混杂因素的NMA不同,本次更新纳入了个体患者水平数据(IPD)回归以提供更稳健的调整。

方法

进行了一项更新综述以识别纳入贝叶斯NMA的随机对照试验。该网络包括初始5剂后每8周注射2毫克玻璃体内阿柏西普(IVT-AFL)、按需注射0.5毫克雷珠单抗(PRN)、治疗并延长方案注射0.5毫克雷珠单抗(T&E)以及激光光凝。分析纳入的结局包括使用早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)视力表测量的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)变化,以及在12个月时获得/损失≥10和≥15个ETDRS字母的患者。使用仅限于IPD和IPD与汇总数据的网络进行分析,(i)不进行协变量调整,(ii)假设具有共同交互作用(相对于对照治疗)对基线BCVA进行协变量调整,以及(iii)针对每个治疗比较进行特定的协变量调整(仅限于IPD网络))。

结果

13项试验纳入分析。在所有分析中,IVT-AFL每8周一次优于激光光凝。对于BCVA的平均变化(平均差值5.20,95%可信区间[CrI] 1.90 - 8.52个ETDRS字母)、≥15个ETDRS字母的改善(优势比[OR] 2.30,95% CrI 1.12 - 4.20)以及≥10个ETDRS字母的损失(OR 0.25,95% CrI 0.05 - 0.74),IVT-AFL每8周一次相对于0.5毫克雷珠单抗PRN显示出优越性的有力证据(IPD和汇总随机效应模型,对基线BCVA进行调整)。对于BCVA的平均变化(平均差值5.15,95% CrI -0.26 - 10.61个ETDRS字母),IVT-AFL每8周一次并不优于0.5毫克雷珠单抗T&E(IPD和汇总随机效应模型)。

结论

这项纳入IPD以提高分析稳健性的NMA显示,IVT-AFL每8周一次优于激光光凝和0.5毫克雷珠单抗PRN。这些结果与对基线BCVA的调整无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/279f/6307247/eb2d33e18988/12886_2018_1006_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验