Suppr超能文献

术中扭矩测试评估下胫腓联合不稳定。

Intraoperative Torque Test to Assess Syndesmosis Instability.

机构信息

1 Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

2 Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Apr;40(4):408-413. doi: 10.1177/1071100718816674. Epub 2018 Dec 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

: In this cadaveric study, a new "torque test" (TT) stressing the fibula posterolaterally under direct visualization was compared with the classical external rotation stress test (ERT) and lateral stress test (LST).

METHODS

: The anteroinferior tibiofibular ligament (AiTFL), the interosseous membrane (IOM), and the posteroinferior tibiofibular ligament (PiTFL) were sectioned sequentially on 10 fresh-frozen human ankles. At each stage of dissection, instability was assessed using the LST, ERT, and TT under direct visualization. Anatomical tibiofibular diastasis measurements were taken directly on cadavers and compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

: All 3 tests showed statistically significant motion in the syndesmosis when at least 2 ligaments were sectioned. The mean increase across diastasis with a 2-ligament section was 3.0 mm ( P = .005), 3.2 mm ( P = .005), and 4.8 mm ( P = .005) for the LST, ERT, and TT, respectively. The largest mean increase in diastasis was obtained with a complete injury using the TT and was 6.2 mm ( P = .008). With the TT, a 3.5-mm tibiofibular diastasis was 90% sensitive and 100% specific when 2 or more syndesmotic ligaments were sectioned.

CONCLUSION

: The TT was a more sensitive and specific tool for detecting syndesmosis instability than classic LST and ERT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

: Stressing the fibula in a posterolateral direction created a larger distal tibiofibular diastasis, which would be easier to detect in the intraoperative setting. The TT was more sensitive and specific to detecting a 2-ligament syndesmotic injury than the classic test and required less force to perform.

摘要

背景

在这项尸体研究中,我们比较了一种新的“扭矩测试”(TT)与经典的外旋应力测试(ERT)和外侧应力测试(LST),后者在直接可视化下对腓骨后外侧施加应力。

方法

在 10 例新鲜冷冻的人踝关节中,我们依次切断胫腓下前韧带(AiTFL)、骨间膜(IOM)和胫腓下后韧带(PiTFL)。在每次解剖阶段,我们使用 LST、ERT 和 TT 在直接可视化下评估不稳定。直接在尸体上进行解剖胫腓分离测量,并使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行比较。

结果

当至少切断 2 条韧带时,所有 3 种测试均显示在联合处有统计学意义的运动。2 条韧带切断后,横距的平均增加量分别为 LST 3.0 毫米(P=.005)、ERT 3.2 毫米(P=.005)和 TT 4.8 毫米(P=.005)。TT 下完全损伤时,横距的平均增加量最大,为 6.2 毫米(P=.008)。当 TT 下 2 条或更多联合韧带切断时,3.5 毫米的胫腓分离有 90%的敏感性和 100%的特异性。

结论

与经典的 LST 和 ERT 相比,TT 是一种更敏感和特异的检测联合不稳定的工具。

临床相关性

腓骨后外侧方向的应力会导致更大的远端胫腓分离,这在术中更容易检测到。TT 比经典测试更能敏感和特异的检测到 2 条韧带的联合损伤,并且需要的力更小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验