Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan; Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.
Vascul Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;113:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
We tested the hypothesis that extracorporeal-shock-wave (ECSW)-assisted adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) therapy was better than either one for restoring the blood flow in critical limb ischemia (CLI). Adult male-SD rats were categorized into group 1 (sham-operated-control), group 2 (CLI), group 3 [CLI + ECSW (280 impulses/0.10 mJ/mm) applied to left inguinal area at 3 h after CLI], group 4 [CLI + SVF (1.2 × 10) implanted into CLI area at 3 h after CLI], group 5 (CLI + ECSW-SVF). In vitro studies showed that ECSW significantly enhanced angiogenesis in human umbilical-vein endothelial cells and carotid-artery ring, and SVF significantly suppressed inflammation (TNF-α/NF-Κb/IL-1ß/MMP-9) in smooth-muscle cells treated by LPS (all p < .001). By day 14 after CLI, the ratio of ischemic/normal blood flow (INBF) was highest in group 1, lowest in group 2, significantly higher in group 5 than in groups 3 and 4, but no difference was shown between the latter two groups (all p < .001). The fibrotic area in CLI region exhibited an opposite pattern of INBF ratio (all p < .0001). Protein (CD31/vWF/eNOS) and cellular (CD31/vWF) expressions and number of small vessels in CLI area exhibited an identical pattern, whilst protein expressions of apoptotic (caspase3/PARP/mitochondrial-Bax) fibrotic/DNA-damaged (Samd3/TFG-ß/γ-H2AX) biomarkers exhibited an opposite pattern to INBF among five groups (all p < .0001). The numbers of angiogenetic cells in CLI region (SDF-1α/VEGF/CXCR4) and endothelial-progenitor cells (C-kit/CD31+//Sca-1/CD31+//CD34/KDR+/VE-cadherin/CD34+) in circulation significantly and progressively increased from groups 2 to 5 (all p < .0001). In conclusion, ECSW-SVF therapy effectively enhanced angiogenesis and restoration of blood flow in CLI area.
我们验证了一个假设,即体外冲击波(ECSW)辅助脂肪来源的基质血管部分(SVF)治疗比单一疗法更能恢复临界肢体缺血(CLI)的血流。成年雄性 SD 大鼠分为以下几组:第 1 组(假手术对照)、第 2 组(CLI)、第 3 组(CLI 后 3 小时在左侧腹股沟区应用 280 脉冲/0.10 mJ/mm 的 ECSW)、第 4 组(CLI 后 3 小时将 1.2×10 的 SVF 植入 CLI 区)、第 5 组(CLI+ECSW-SVF)。体外研究表明,ECSW 可显著增强人脐静脉内皮细胞和颈动脉环的血管生成,SVF 可显著抑制 LPS 处理的平滑肌细胞中的炎症(TNF-α/NF-Κb/IL-1ß/MMP-9)(均 p<0.001)。CLI 后 14 天,第 1 组的缺血/正常血流比(INBF)最高,第 2 组最低,第 5 组明显高于第 3 组和第 4 组,但后两组之间无差异(均 p<0.001)。CLI 区的纤维化面积与 INBF 比呈相反的模式(均 p<0.0001)。CLI 区的蛋白(CD31/vWF/eNOS)和细胞(CD31/vWF)表达及小血管数量呈相同模式,而凋亡(caspase3/PARP/mitochondrial-Bax)、纤维化/DNA 损伤(Samd3/TFG-ß/γ-H2AX)生物标志物的蛋白表达与 5 组的 INBF 呈相反模式(均 p<0.0001)。CLI 区的血管生成细胞(SDF-1α/VEGF/CXCR4)和循环中的内皮祖细胞(C-kit/CD31+//Sca-1/CD31+//CD34/KDR+/VE-cadherin/CD34+)数量从第 2 组到第 5 组显著且逐渐增加(均 p<0.0001)。综上所述,ECSW-SVF 治疗可有效增强 CLI 区的血管生成和血流恢复。