Shukla Samarth, Acharya Sourya, Vagha Sunita, Dawande Pratibha, Tamhane Ankita
Department of Pathology, JN Medical College, DMIMS University, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Medicine, JN Medical College, DMIMS University, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2018 Oct-Dec;8(4):210-216. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_331_17.
Nottingham's modification of Bloom-Richardson histopathological grading system (NGS) for carcinoma breast is a time-tested prognostic indicator; however, of lately, breast cancer has been evaluated through molecular techniques, particularly assessing the gene expression profiling and establishing molecular or immunophenotypes. The present-day utility of NGS needs to be reassessed with the modern predictive markers, this may help refine breast cancer classification specifically to help improve the treatment protocol.
The objective was to compare breast cancer immunophenotypes with prognostic factors such as age (based on menstrual status), tumor size, lymph node (LN) status, also to compare the NGS grade with the molecular immunphenotypes of breast cancer.
The present work was carried out in the Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry section of Department of Pathology, of a central Indian medical college and rural hospital from January 2013 to July 2016. It was a prospective analytical study. A tota1 of 114 female patients presenting in the outpatient department of surgery with lump in breast were included in the present study. All patients underwent modified radical mastectomy for tumor resection. Tumor masses and LNs were subjected to routine hematoxylin and eosin staining as well as immunohistochemistry then examined by a senior pathologist. Comparisons were made between molecular immunophenotypes with patient age, tumor size, and LN status, further NGS grade of breast cancer was compared with immunophenotypes.
The study found that the molecular immunophenotypes when compared with clinical prognostic parameters, i.e; age (based on menstrual status of female), LN involvement in patients of breast carcinoma showed inconsequential correlation, the tumor size showed significant correlation. However, when histopathological grades were compared with molecular immunophenotypes, a significant correlation was seen.
NGS grade being an excellent predictive prognostic tool should be continued for assessing the grades in breast cancer patients. The molecular markers correlate with the histopathological grading and indirectly aid the oncologist in assessing the aggressiveness, these immunophenotypes are not helpful as suitable prognostic tools. As the molecular phenotypes definitely indicate the hormonal receptor status in breast cancer patients, they become mandatory in guiding oncologists for planning the treatment strategy and protocol.
诺丁汉对乳腺癌布鲁姆 - 理查森组织病理学分级系统(NGS)的改良是经过时间检验的预后指标;然而,近来乳腺癌已通过分子技术进行评估,特别是评估基因表达谱以及建立分子或免疫表型。NGS在当今的实用性需要用现代预测标志物重新评估,这可能有助于细化乳腺癌分类,特别是有助于改进治疗方案。
目的是比较乳腺癌免疫表型与年龄(基于月经状态)、肿瘤大小、淋巴结(LN)状态等预后因素,同时比较乳腺癌的NGS分级与分子免疫表型。
本研究于2013年1月至2016年7月在印度中部一所医学院和乡村医院的病理学系组织病理学和免疫组织化学科进行。这是一项前瞻性分析研究。本研究纳入了114例在外科门诊出现乳腺肿块的女性患者。所有患者均接受改良根治性乳房切除术以切除肿瘤。肿瘤肿块和淋巴结进行常规苏木精和伊红染色以及免疫组织化学检查,然后由一位资深病理学家进行检查。对分子免疫表型与患者年龄、肿瘤大小和LN状态进行比较,进一步比较乳腺癌的NGS分级与免疫表型。
研究发现,分子免疫表型与临床预后参数(即女性月经状态的年龄、乳腺癌患者的LN受累情况)相比,相关性不显著,而与肿瘤大小显示出显著相关性。然而,当组织病理学分级与分子免疫表型进行比较时,发现存在显著相关性。
NGS分级作为一种优秀的预测预后工具,应继续用于评估乳腺癌患者的分级。分子标志物与组织病理学分级相关,间接帮助肿瘤学家评估侵袭性,这些免疫表型作为合适的预后工具并无帮助。由于分子表型明确表明乳腺癌患者的激素受体状态,它们在指导肿瘤学家制定治疗策略和方案方面变得至关重要。