Suppr超能文献

BLES与固尔苏对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗效果的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of the effects of BLES and Survanta on treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in newborns.

作者信息

Macooie Ali Aghayar, Fakour Zahra, Roanaghi Paria

机构信息

Department of Pediatric, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia Medical Science University, Urmia, Iran.

Faculty of Medicine, Urmia Medical Science University, Urmia, Iran.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2018 Sep-Oct;7(5):1063-1067. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_188_17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Symptoms of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), which is inverse correlation with gestational age and birth weight, occur in premature infants and newborns. The main objective of the study is comparative evaluation of the effects of BLES and Survanta on treatment of RDS in newborns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In all, 100 patients were randomly divided into two groups of 50 subjects in this study. While the group receiving BLES included 32 (64%) male and 18 (36%) female infants, there were 29 (58%) male and 51 (52%) female infants in the other group which received Survanta.

RESULTS

Although the results of this study showed improvement in respiratory status based on Downes scoring system in both groups after receiving surfactant, there was no significant difference in terms of short-term respiratory enhancement based on Downes scoring system among two groups. Pulmonary hemorrhage was the most frequent complication, with five cases (10%), among infants in BLES group; with five cases, pneumonia was the most observed complication in the group receiving Survanta. No significant difference in terms of complication was observed between two groups ( = 0.438); there was no significant difference in terms of mortality among two groups ( = 0.828).

CONCLUSION

Both groups experienced respiratory status enhancement after receiving surfactant and the results of arterial blood gas (ABG) showed positive effects and efficiency of both drugs. Lack of significant difference in the effects of two mentioned drugs, BLES and Survanta, can be the main cause behind the absence of significant difference between two groups in terms of changes in respiratory status or ABG in newborns. No significant difference was observed in terms of complication between two groups, indicating lack of difference in the effects of medicines injected for infants suffering from RDS.

摘要

背景与目的

呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的症状出现在早产儿和新生儿中,与胎龄和出生体重呈负相关。本研究的主要目的是比较评估贝乐施(BLES)和固尔苏(Survanta)对新生儿RDS的治疗效果。

材料与方法

本研究共100例患者被随机分为两组,每组50例。接受贝乐施治疗的组中,男婴32例(64%),女婴18例(36%);另一组接受固尔苏治疗,男婴29例(58%),女婴21例(42%)。

结果

尽管本研究结果显示两组在接受表面活性剂治疗后,基于唐斯评分系统的呼吸状况均有改善,但两组在基于唐斯评分系统的短期呼吸改善方面无显著差异。肺出血是贝乐施组婴儿中最常见的并发症,有5例(10%);在接受固尔苏治疗的组中,肺炎是最常见的并发症,有5例。两组在并发症方面无显著差异(P = 0.438);两组在死亡率方面无显著差异(P = 0.828)。

结论

两组在接受表面活性剂治疗后呼吸状况均得到改善,动脉血气(ABG)结果显示两种药物均有积极作用且有效。上述两种药物,即贝乐施和固尔苏,效果无显著差异,可能是两组在新生儿呼吸状况或ABG变化方面无显著差异的主要原因。两组在并发症方面无显著差异,表明针对患有RDS的婴儿注射的药物效果无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验