Department of Chemistry , National University of Singapore , Singapore 117543 , Singapore.
Department of Environmental Chemistry and Bioanalytics, Center for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies , Nicolaus Copernicus University , Wileńska 4 , 87-100 Toruń , Poland.
Chem Rev. 2019 Mar 27;119(6):3674-3729. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00246. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) is the most popular chromatographic mode, accounting for more than 90% of all separations. HPLC itself owes its immense popularity to it being relatively simple and inexpensive, with the equipment being reliable and easy to operate. Due to extensive automation, it can be run virtually unattended with multiple samples at various separation conditions, even by relatively low-skilled personnel. Currently, there are >600 RP-HPLC columns available to end users for purchase, some of which exhibit very large differences in selectivity and production quality. Often, two similar RP-HPLC columns are not equally suitable for the requisite separation, and to date, there is no universal RP-HPLC column covering a variety of analytes. This forces analytical laboratories to keep a multitude of diverse columns. Therefore, column selection is a crucial segment of RP-HPLC method development, especially since sample complexity is constantly increasing. Rationally choosing an appropriate column is complicated. In addition to the differences in the primary intermolecular interactions with analytes of the dispersive (London) type, individual columns can also exhibit a unique character owing to specific polar, hydrogen bond, and electron pair donor-acceptor interactions. They can also vary depending on the type of packing, amount and type of residual silanols, "end-capping", bonding density of ligands, and pore size, among others. Consequently, the chromatographic performance of RP-HPLC systems is often considerably altered depending on the selected column. Although a wide spectrum of knowledge is available on this important subject, there is still a lack of a comprehensive review for an objective comparison and/or selection of chromatographic columns. We aim for this review to be a comprehensive, authoritative, critical, and easily readable monograph of the most relevant publications regarding column selection and characterization in RP-HPLC covering the past four decades. Future perspectives, which involve the integration of state-of-the-art molecular simulations (molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo) with minimal experiments, aimed at nearly "experiment-free" column selection methodology, are proposed.
反相高效液相色谱(RP-HPLC)是最流行的色谱模式,占所有分离的 90%以上。HPLC 本身之所以如此受欢迎,是因为它相对简单且价格低廉,设备可靠且易于操作。由于广泛的自动化,它可以在各种分离条件下无人值守地运行多个样品,即使是由技术水平较低的人员操作也是如此。目前,有 >600 种 RP-HPLC 柱可供最终用户购买,其中一些在选择性和生产质量方面有很大差异。通常,两个相似的 RP-HPLC 柱并不完全适合所需的分离,迄今为止,没有一种通用的 RP-HPLC 柱可以涵盖各种分析物。这迫使分析实验室保留多种不同的柱子。因此,柱选择是 RP-HPLC 方法开发的关键部分,特别是因为样品的复杂性在不断增加。合理选择合适的柱子是复杂的。除了与分散(伦敦)类型的分析物的主要分子间相互作用的差异外,由于特定的极性、氢键和电子对供体-受体相互作用,个别柱子也可以表现出独特的特征。它们还可以根据填充类型、残留硅醇的数量和类型、“端封端”、配体的键合密度和孔径等因素而有所不同。因此,RP-HPLC 系统的色谱性能通常会根据所选柱子而发生很大变化。尽管在这个重要主题上有广泛的知识,但仍然缺乏对色谱柱进行全面比较和/或选择的综合评论。我们希望本综述成为过去四十年中关于 RP-HPLC 中柱选择和特性的最相关出版物的全面、权威、批判性和易读的专著。提出了未来的展望,涉及将最先进的分子模拟(分子动力学或蒙特卡罗)与最小实验相结合,旨在实现几乎“无实验”的柱选择方法。