Suppr超能文献

免疫测定法检测羊水时血液污染的影响。

Effect of blood contamination on amniotic fluid detection using immunoassays.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Women and Newborns Clinical Program, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Sep;33(17):2909-2912. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1564027. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

Abstract

To determine the accuracy of Actim PROM, Amnisure, and ROM Plus tests for detecting amniotic fluid proteins in the setting of blood contamination. IGFBP-1 and AFP are proteins present in high concentrations in amniotic fluid, and are detected by three commercially-available immunoassays used for diagnosing ruptured membranes: Actim PROM, Amnisure, and ROM Plus. We used whole blood samples and diluted these with amniotic fluid (containing known concentrations of amniotic fluid proteins) to whole blood levels of 50, 20, 10, 5, and 1%. Actim PROM, Amnisure, and ROM Plus tests were performed on each sample in duplicate according to package insert instructions. Results were interpreted independently at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min by two obstetricians who were blinded to the concentrations of blood and amniotic fluid proteins in each sample. Results of each test were determined to be true positive, false negative, false positive, or true negative based on physician interpretation and whether amniotic fluid had been spiked into the samples in detectable concentrations. Overall accuracy, intraobserver concordance, and interobserver concordance, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for each test were calculated. Fisher exact test was used to compare test characteristics, with a -value of <.05 considered significant. Out of 120 tests performed, there were no false positive results for any test. Overall, ROM Plus had better accuracy (97.9%) than Amnisure (80.7%) or Actim PROM (78.3%). Intra- and interobserver concordance were similar for all three tests (98-100%). ROM Plus had significantly higher sensitivity than Amnisure and Actim PROM ( < .0001). There was no significant difference in sensitivity between Amnisure and Actim PROM ( = .51). ROM Plus maintains strong test characteristics for the detection of amniotic fluid proteins in the setting of blood contamination, and performs significantly better than Amnisure and Actim PROM tests in the presence of blood.

摘要

为了确定 Actim PROM、Amnisure 和 ROM Plus 检测血液污染条件下羊水蛋白的准确性。IGFBP-1 和 AFP 是在羊水中高浓度存在的蛋白质,并且通过三种用于诊断胎膜破裂的商业上可用的免疫测定法检测:Actim PROM、Amnisure 和 ROM Plus。我们使用全血样本并用羊水稀释(含有已知浓度的羊水蛋白)至全血水平的 50、20、10、5 和 1%。根据包装说明书的说明,对每个样本进行两次重复的 Actim PROM、Amnisure 和 ROM Plus 测试。两名产科医生在 5、10、15 和 20 分钟时独立对每个样本进行解释,他们对每个样本的血液和羊水蛋白浓度均不知情。根据医生的解释以及样本中是否存在可检测浓度的羊水,确定每个测试的结果为真阳性、假阴性、假阳性或真阴性。计算了每种测试的总准确率、观察者内一致性和观察者间一致性、敏感性、特异性和预测值。Fisher 精确检验用于比较测试特征,-值<.05 被认为具有统计学意义。在进行的 120 次测试中,任何测试均无假阳性结果。总体而言,ROM Plus 的准确性(97.9%)优于 Amnisure(80.7%)或 Actim PROM(78.3%)。所有三种测试的观察者内和观察者间一致性相似(98-100%)。ROM Plus 的敏感性明显高于 Amnisure 和 Actim PROM(<0.0001)。Amnisure 和 Actim PROM 之间的敏感性无显著差异(=0.51)。ROM Plus 在血液污染情况下检测羊水蛋白的测试特征保持强劲,并且在存在血液的情况下表现明显优于 Amnisure 和 Actim PROM 测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验