Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑预处理对丙泊酚靶控输注期间丙泊酚和罗库溴铵起效的影响。

Effect of midazolam premedication on the onset of propofol and rocuronium during propofol target-controlled infusion.

作者信息

Goo Eui Kyoung, Jung Cheol Hee, Kim Hwan Hee, So Yun Mi, Na Hyo Seok, Park Hee Pyoung, Jeon Young Tae, Hwang Jung Won

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2009 Oct;57(4):434-437. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2009.57.4.434.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This clinical study was designed to evaluate the effect of midazolam as a premedication on the onset of propofol and rocuronium during propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI).

METHODS

Seventy four patients (ASA class I or II) were randomly allocated to receive either no premedication (control group) or premedication with 0.04 mg/kg intravenous midazolam (midazolam group). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol TCI. Time from propofol injection to loss of consciousness (LOC) and estimated effect concentration at LOC were recorded. After LOC, rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) was injected. We monitored the degree of neuromuscular blockade by acceleromyography. The following parameters were measured and compared between groups: Time from rocuronium injection to depression of twitch height below 25%, time to maximal depression of twitch height (defined as rocuronium onset time).

RESULTS

Systolic blood pressure before induction was lower in midazolam group (125 +/- 15 vs 135 +/- 20 mmHg), however, there was no difference in blood pressure at LOC between groups (111 +/- 16 vs 106 +/- 21 mmHg). In midazolam group, time to LOC in propofol TCI was shorter (63 +/- 22 vs. 203 +/- 118 sec) and estimated effect site concentration of propofol was significantly lower than control group (0.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.4 microl/ml). The onset time of rocuronium was not different between groups (120 +/- 39 vs. 137 +/- 42 sec).

CONCLUSIONS

Midazolam pretreatment fastens the onset time of propofol and decreases the propofol requirement for LOC. However, it does not influence the onset of rocuronium.

摘要

背景

本临床研究旨在评估咪达唑仑作为术前用药对丙泊酚靶控输注(TCI)期间丙泊酚和罗库溴铵起效的影响。

方法

74例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I或II级的患者被随机分配,分别接受不用术前用药(对照组)或静脉注射0.04mg/kg咪达唑仑进行术前用药(咪达唑仑组)。采用丙泊酚TCI诱导并维持麻醉。记录从注射丙泊酚到意识消失(LOC)的时间以及LOC时的估计效应浓度。LOC后,注射罗库溴铵(0.6mg/kg)。通过加速度肌电图监测神经肌肉阻滞程度。测量并比较两组之间的以下参数:从注射罗库溴铵到颤搐高度降低至25%以下的时间、颤搐高度最大降低的时间(定义为罗库溴铵起效时间)。

结果

咪达唑仑组诱导前收缩压较低(125±15 vs 135±20mmHg),然而,两组LOC时的血压无差异(111±16 vs 106±21mmHg)。在咪达唑仑组中,丙泊酚TCI时达到LOC的时间较短(63±22 vs 203±118秒),丙泊酚的估计效应室浓度显著低于对照组(0.9±0.3 vs 2.2±0.4μg/ml)。两组罗库溴铵的起效时间无差异(120±39 vs 137±42秒)。

结论

咪达唑仑预处理可加快丙泊酚的起效时间,并降低达到LOC所需的丙泊酚剂量。然而,它不影响罗库溴铵的起效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验