Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Southeast Radiation Oncology Group and Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Neurosurgery. 2019 Mar 1;84(3):E159-E162. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy541.
Adult patients (older than 18 yr of age) with newly diagnosed brain metastases.
If whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is used, is there an optimal dose/fractionation schedule?
Level 1: A standard WBRT dose/fractionation schedule (ie, 30 Gy in 10 fractions or a biological equivalent dose [BED] of 39 Gy10) is recommended as altered dose/fractionation schedules do not result in significant differences in median survival or local control. Level 3: Due to concerns regarding neurocognitive effects, higher dose per fraction schedules (such as 20 Gy in 5 fractions) are recommended only for patients with poor performance status or short predicted survival. Level 3: WBRT can be recommended to improve progression-free survival for patients with more than 4 brain metastases.
What impact does tumor histopathology or molecular status have on the decision to use WBRT, the dose fractionation scheme to be utilized, and its outcomes?
There is insufficient evidence to support the choice of any particular dose/fractionation regimen based on histopathology. Molecular status may have an impact on the decision to delay WBRT in subgroups of patients, but there is not sufficient data to make a more definitive recommendation.
Separate from survival outcomes, what are the neurocognitive consequences of WBRT, and what steps can be taken to minimize them?
Level 2: Due to neurocognitive toxicity, local therapy (surgery or SRS) without WBRT is recommended for patients with ≤4 brain metastases amenable to local therapy in terms of size and location. Level 2: Given the association of neurocognitive toxicity with increasing total dose and dose per fraction of WBRT, WBRT doses exceeding 30 Gy given in 10 fractions, or similar biologically equivalent doses, are not recommended, except in patients with poor performance status or short predicted survival. Level 2: If prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is given to prevent brain metastases for small cell lung cancer, the recommended WBRT dose/fractionation regimen is 25 Gy in 10 fractions, and because this can be associated with neurocognitive decline, patients should be told of this risk at the same time they are counseled about the possible survival benefits. Level 3: Patients having WBRT (given for either existing brain metastases or as PCI) should be offered 6 mo of memantine to potentially delay, lessen, or prevent the associated neurocognitive toxicity.
Does the addition of WBRT after surgical resection or radiosurgery improve progression-free or overall survival outcomes when compared to surgical resection or radiosurgery alone?
Level 2: WBRT is not recommended in WHO performance status 0 to 2 patients with up to 4 brain metastases because, compared to surgical resection or radiosurgery alone, the addition of WBRT improves intracranial progression-free survival but not overall survival. Level 2: In WHO performance status 0 to 2 patients with up to 4 brain metastases where the goal is minimizing neurocognitive toxicity, as opposed to maximizing progression-free survival and overall survival, local therapy (surgery or radiosurgery) without WBRT is recommended. Level 3: Compared to surgical resection or radiosurgery alone, the addition of WBRT is not recommended for patients with more than 4 brain metastases unless the metastases' volume exceeds 7 cc, or there are more than 15 metastases, or the size or location of the metastases are not amenable to surgical resection or radiosurgery.The full guideline can be found at: https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-treatment-adults-metastatic-brain-tumors/chapter_3.
新诊断为脑转移的成年患者(年龄大于 18 岁)。
如果使用全脑放射治疗(WBRT),是否存在最佳剂量/分割方案?
1 级:推荐使用标准的 WBRT 剂量/分割方案(即 30 Gy 分 10 次或生物等效剂量[BED]为 39 Gy10),因为改变剂量/分割方案不会导致中位生存期或局部控制的显著差异。3 级:由于对神经认知影响的担忧,仅建议为表现状态差或预计生存时间短的患者推荐更高的单次剂量分割方案(如 20 Gy 分 5 次)。3 级:对于有超过 4 个脑转移灶的患者,WBRT 可改善无进展生存期。
肿瘤组织病理学或分子状态对使用 WBRT 的决策、要使用的剂量分割方案及其结果有何影响?
没有足够的证据支持根据组织病理学选择任何特定的剂量/分割方案。分子状态可能会影响对某些患者延迟 WBRT 的决策,但没有足够的数据做出更明确的建议。
除了生存结果外,WBRT 的神经认知后果是什么,以及可以采取哪些措施将其最小化?
2 级:对于大小和位置适合局部治疗(手术或 SRS)的≤4 个脑转移灶的患者,建议在不进行 WBRT 的情况下进行局部治疗。2 级:由于 WBRT 的神经认知毒性与总剂量和单次剂量的增加有关,因此不建议使用超过 30 Gy 的 WBRT 剂量分 10 次给予,或类似的生物等效剂量,除非患者表现状态差或预计生存时间短。2 级:如果为预防小细胞肺癌的脑转移而给予预防性颅照射(PCI),则推荐的 WBRT 剂量/分割方案为 25 Gy 分 10 次,由于这可能与神经认知下降有关,因此在向患者提供 WBRT 时,应同时告知他们这种风险,同时告知他们可能的生存获益。3 级:接受 WBRT(无论是为了现有脑转移还是为了 PCI)的患者应考虑接受 6 个月的美金刚治疗,以潜在地延迟、减轻或预防相关的神经认知毒性。
与单独手术切除或放射外科治疗相比,手术切除或放射外科治疗后加用 WBRT 是否能改善无进展生存期或总生存期的结果?
2 级:对于 WHO 表现状态为 0 至 2 分、有不超过 4 个脑转移灶的患者,不建议加用 WBRT,因为与单独手术切除或放射外科治疗相比,加用 WBRT 可改善颅内无进展生存期,但不能改善总生存期。2 级:对于 WHO 表现状态为 0 至 2 分、有不超过 4 个脑转移灶且旨在最大程度降低神经认知毒性而非最大程度提高无进展生存期和总生存期的患者,建议不进行 WBRT,而是采用局部治疗(手术或放射外科治疗)。3 级:与单独手术切除或放射外科治疗相比,不建议对于有超过 4 个脑转移灶的患者加用 WBRT,除非转移灶的体积超过 7 cc,或有超过 15 个转移灶,或转移灶的大小或位置不适合手术切除或放射外科治疗。完整的指南可在以下网址找到:https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-treatment-adults-metastatic-brain-tumors/chapter_3。