Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada; International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada; International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Auton Neurosci. 2019 Mar;217:102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
When upright, venous pooling and capillary filtration reduce the effective circulating volume and are key contributors to susceptibility to syncope (fainting). Recurrent syncope has a devastating impact on quality of life. Static calf compression garments are frequently prescribed for patients with syncope, but have questionable efficacy. Intermittent calf compression, which mimics the skeletal muscle pump to minimize pooling and filtration, is a potential alternative that holds promise for the management of syncope. We aimed to evaluate use of intermittent calf compression compared to commonly prescribed compression stockings, and determine the optimal intermittent calf compression paradigm, for improvement of orthostatic fluid shifts and cardiovascular control. We evaluated heart rate, blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output and peripheral resistance (finger plethysmography with Modelflow™) and calf pooling and filtration (calf circumference; strain gauge plethysmography) during a series of 10-min head-upright tilts. We first compared (protocol one) low (ICLF; 4 s on, 11 s off) and high (ICHF; 4 s on, 6 s off) frequency 0-100 mm Hg intermittent calf compression with static elastic and inelastic compression stockings and a placebo condition (n = 19, 5 males, aged 23.5 ± 0.1 years). We then compared (protocol two) ICLF applied at 0-40 mm Hg, 0-60 mm Hg, 0-80 mm Hg and 0-100 mm Hg as well as a placebo condition (n = 15, 5 males, aged 22.7 ± 0.5 years). The intervention order was randomized. In protocol one, all compression conditions significantly reduced calf circumference (p < 0.001) compared to placebo after 10-min upright; however, this reduction was greater in ICLF (-0.88 ± 0.18%) and ICHF (-1.14 ± 0.21%) conditions than both elastic (+0.49 ± 0.17%) and inelastic (-0.01 ± 0.19%) compression (p < 0.001). ICLF and ICHF, but not elastic or inelastic compression, were associated with improved stroke volume (p ≤ 0.001), allowing cardiac output to be maintained at a reduced heart rate (p < 0.001) without increases in vascular resistance responses, increasing hemodynamic reserve. ICHF showed no significant benefit over ICLF, evidenced by the lack of significant difference between ICLF and ICHF in any parameter measured. In protocol two, 0-60 mm Hg ICLF was considered the optimal intermittent compression because it was the lowest pressure that abolished the increase in calf circumference during orthostasis, while improving SV (p = 0.002), and reducing HR (p < 0.001) throughout tilt. Intermittent calf compression from 0 to 60 mm Hg ICLF is the optimal intermittent compression paradigm to ameliorate orthostatic fluid shifts and improve hemodynamic control. Commonly prescribed static calf compression garments do not improve orthostatic cardiovascular responses.
当人体直立时,静脉淤积和毛细血管滤过会减少有效循环血量,这是导致晕厥(昏厥)易感性的关键因素。反复晕厥会严重影响生活质量。经常为晕厥患者开具小腿静态压缩服,但疗效存在疑问。间歇性小腿压缩通过模拟骨骼肌泵来最小化淤积和过滤,是一种有希望用于晕厥管理的潜在替代方法。我们旨在评估与常用的压缩袜相比,间歇性小腿压缩的使用情况,并确定改善直立位液体转移和心血管控制的最佳间歇性小腿压缩方案。我们评估了心率、血压、每搏量、心输出量和外周阻力(使用 Modelflow™ 的手指体积描记法)以及小腿淤积和过滤(小腿周长;应变计体积描记法)在一系列 10 分钟的头高位倾斜中。我们首先比较了(方案一)低(ICLF;4s 开,11s 关)和高(ICHF;4s 开,6s 关)频率 0-100mmHg 的间歇性小腿压缩与静态弹性和非弹性压缩袜以及安慰剂条件(n=19,5 名男性,年龄 23.5±0.1 岁)。然后我们比较了(方案二)0-40mmHg、0-60mmHg、0-80mmHg 和 0-100mmHg 的 ICLF 以及安慰剂条件(n=15,5 名男性,年龄 22.7±0.5 岁)。干预顺序是随机的。在方案一中,与安慰剂相比,所有压缩条件在 10 分钟直立后均显著减小了小腿周长(p<0.001);然而,ICLF(-0.88±0.18%)和 ICHF(-1.14±0.21%)条件下的这种减小大于弹性(+0.49±0.17%)和非弹性(-0.01±0.19%)压缩(p<0.001)。ICLF 和 ICHF,但不是弹性或非弹性压缩,与改善的每搏量相关(p≤0.001),允许心输出量在降低心率的情况下得到维持(p<0.001),而不增加血管阻力反应,增加血流动力学储备。与 ICLF 相比,ICHF 没有显示出显著的益处,这表现在 ICLF 和 ICHF 之间在任何测量参数上都没有显著差异。在方案二中,0-60mmHg 的 ICLF 被认为是最佳的间歇性压缩,因为它是在直立期间消除小腿周长增加的最低压力,同时改善 SV(p=0.002),并降低 HR(p<0.001)在整个倾斜过程中。0-60mmHg ICLF 的间歇性小腿压缩是改善直立位液体转移和改善血流动力学控制的最佳间歇性压缩方案。常用的静态小腿压缩服并不能改善直立位心血管反应。