外科护理与结果评估项目（SCOAP）：一个用于结直肠外科研究的细致入微、灵活多变的平台。
Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP): A Nuanced, Flexible Platform for Colorectal Surgical Research.
作者信息
Simianu Vlad V, Kumar Anjali S
机构信息
Colorectal Surgery Program, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Everett, Spokane, Tri-Cities, and Vancouver, Washington.
出版信息
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):25-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673351. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
Abstract
The Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) is a surgeon-led quality improvement (QI) initiative developed in Washington State to track and reduce variability in surgical care. It has developed into a collaboration of over two-thirds of the hospitals in the state, who share data and receive regular benchmarking reports. Data are abstracted at each site by trained abstractors. While there has some overlap with other national QI databases, the data captured by SCOAP has clinical nuances that make it pragmatic for studying surgical care. We review the unique properties of SCOAP and offer some examples of its novel applications.
摘要
外科护理与结果评估项目（SCOAP）是华盛顿州发起的一项由外科医生主导的质量改进（QI）倡议，旨在追踪并减少外科护理中的变异性。它已发展成为该州三分之二以上医院的合作项目，这些医院共享数据并定期接收基准报告。数据由经过培训的提取人员在每个站点进行提取。虽然SCOAP与其他国家QI数据库存在一些重叠，但SCOAP收集的数据具有临床细微差别，使其在研究外科护理方面具有实用性。我们回顾了SCOAP的独特属性，并提供了一些其新颖应用的示例。
相似文献
1
Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP): A Nuanced, Flexible Platform for Colorectal Surgical Research.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):25-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673351. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Creating a learning healthcare system in surgery: Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) at 5 years.
Surgery. 2012 Feb;151(2):146-52. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.015. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
3
Preparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Sep 10;1(1):1025. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1025. eCollection 2013.
4
The Spine Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (Spine SCOAP): a surgeon-led approach to quality and safety.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Mar 1;40(5):332-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000750.
5
Availability of structured and unstructured clinical data for comparative effectiveness research and quality improvement: a multisite assessment.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Jul 11;2(1):1079. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1079. eCollection 2014.
6
Automating data abstraction in a quality improvement platform for surgical and interventional procedures.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Nov 26;2(1):1114. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1114. eCollection 2014.
7
The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative: a statewide Collaborative Quality Initiative.
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E7. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15370.
8
Washington State's approach to variability in surgical processes/Outcomes: Surgical Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP).
Surgery. 2005 Nov;138(5):821-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.026.
9
Communication Training, Adverse Events, and Quality Measures: 2 Retrospective Database Analyses in Washington State Hospitals.
J Patient Saf. 2021 Aug 1;17(5):e393-e400. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000348.
10
Current status of quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):10-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366913.
引用本文的文献
1
"Impact of regional data reporting and feedback on rectal cancer surgery quality metrics in the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP)".
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Mar 7;24:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.03.002. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
How to use communities of practice to support change in learning health systems: A landscape of roles and guidance for management.
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Mar 5;8(3):e10412. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10412. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Learning health systems using data to drive healthcare improvement and impact: a systematic review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 5;21(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06215-8.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessing surgeon behavior change after anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery.
J Surg Res. 2016 Oct;205(2):378-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.075. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
2
Alvimopan Use, Outcomes, and Costs: A Report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network Collaborative.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):870-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.051. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
3
Thromboembolic Complications and Prophylaxis Patterns in Colorectal Surgery.
JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):712-20. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1057.
4
Preparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Sep 10;1(1):1025. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1025. eCollection 2013.
5
The impact of delaying elective resection of diverticulitis on laparoscopic conversion rate.
Am J Surg. 2015 May;209(5):913-8; discussion 918-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.027. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
6
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk for anastomotic failure: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP).
JAMA Surg. 2015 Mar 1;150(3):223-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2239.
7
Addressing the appropriateness of elective colon resection for diverticulitis: a report from the SCOAP CERTAIN collaborative.
Ann Surg. 2014 Sep;260(3):533-8; discussion 538-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000894.
8
Current status of quality measurement in colon and rectal surgery.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2014 Mar;27(1):10-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366913.
9
Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):284-94. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000075.
10
A randomized study on 1-week versus 4-week prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):665-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000340.
Zotero 插件