Atzmon Ran, Radparvar Joshua R, Sharfman Zachary T, Dallich Alison A, Amar Eyal, Rath Ehud
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Assuta Medical Center, Faculty of Health and Science and Ben Gurion University, Ha-Refu'a St 7, Ashdod, Israel.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Tel Aviv University, Weizmann St 6, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Sep 27;5(4):329-338. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny033. eCollection 2018 Dec.
The acetabular labrum plays a key role in maintaining hip function and minimizing hip degeneration. Once thought to be a rare pathology, advances in imaging have led to an increase in the number of diagnosed labral tears. While still a relatively new field, labral reconstruction surgery is an option for tears that are irreparable or require revision after primary repair. Various autograft and allograft options exist when considering labral reconstruction. The first labral reconstruction surgery was described using the ligamentum teres capitis, and has since evolved, incorporating more graft sources and reconstructive techniques. The purpose of this review is to assess and describe the different graft sources and technique currently implemented by hip surgeons. Moreover, this review attempts to determine whether a single labral reconstructive graft type is superior to the others. Techniques using the Ligamentum teres capitis autograft, ITB autograft, gracilis autograft, quadriceps tendon autograft, capsular autograft, semitendinosus allograft, indirect head of the rectus femoris autograft, peroneus brevis tendon allograft and Tensor fascia lata allograft were found. Scoring was available on 5 out of the 9 graft types. The advantages and disadvantages of each graft source is described as a comparative tool. No single graft type has shown increased benefit in acetabular labral reconstruction. The lack of uniform outcome measurements hinders comparison of reported outcomes. Surgeons should make an informed decision based on their experience as well as the patient's history and needs when choosing which graft type would be best suited for their patients.
髋臼盂唇在维持髋关节功能和减少髋关节退变方面起着关键作用。曾经被认为是一种罕见的病理情况,随着影像学的发展,诊断出的盂唇撕裂数量有所增加。虽然盂唇重建手术仍是一个相对较新的领域,但对于无法修复或初次修复后需要翻修的撕裂,它是一种选择。在考虑盂唇重建时,有各种自体移植和异体移植的选择。首次描述的盂唇重建手术是使用股骨头圆韧带,此后不断发展,纳入了更多的移植物来源和重建技术。本综述的目的是评估和描述髋关节外科医生目前采用的不同移植物来源和技术。此外,本综述试图确定单一类型的盂唇重建移植物是否优于其他类型。发现了使用股骨头圆韧带自体移植、阔筋膜张肌自体移植、股薄肌自体移植、股四头肌肌腱自体移植、关节囊自体移植、半腱肌异体移植、股直肌间接头自体移植、腓骨短肌腱异体移植和阔筋膜张肌异体移植的技术。9种移植物类型中有5种有评分。每种移植物来源的优缺点被描述为一种比较工具。在髋臼盂唇重建中,没有单一类型的移植物显示出更大的优势。缺乏统一的结果测量方法阻碍了对报告结果的比较。在选择最适合患者的移植物类型时,外科医生应根据自己的经验以及患者的病史和需求做出明智的决定。