a Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science , Chinese Academy of Sciences , Nanjing , China.
b University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing , China.
Int J Phytoremediation. 2018;20(14):1400-1407. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2018.1488808. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
Differences in growth conditions in the glasshouse and in the field may affect the consistency of phytoextraction results. Two crops of the hyperaccumulator Sedum plumbizincicola were grown in six contrasting soils in pot experiments under three different sets of growth conditions (glasshouse, polytunnel and field) to compare the phytoextraction of cadmium (Cd) and zinc (Zn). The total shoot biomass of two crops in the glasshouse was significantly smaller than in the polytunnel or field. However, in general there were no significant differences in total shoot metal uptake of two crops per pot among three sets of growth conditions. And greater decreases in soil metal than plant uptake in the polytunnel and field in an acid soil indicate high leaching losses of soil metals in the polytunnel and field, and this was confirmed by analysis of metal concentrations in soil profiles. This brings into question on the validity of estimating the practical applicability of phytoextraction based only on plant metal uptake in glasshouse conditions. It is advisable to examine leaching losses in acid soils in the field when estimating the duration of phytoextraction.
温室和田间生长条件的差异可能会影响植物提取结果的一致性。将超积累植物垂盆草(Sedum plumbizincicola)的两茬作物在温室、塑料大棚和田间三种不同生长条件下的盆栽实验中分别种植在六种不同的土壤中,以比较镉(Cd)和锌(Zn)的植物提取效果。温室条件下两茬作物的总地上生物量明显小于塑料大棚或田间条件。然而,一般来说,三种生长条件下每盆作物的总地上金属吸收量没有显著差异。在酸性土壤中,塑料大棚和田间的土壤金属减少量大于植物吸收量,这表明在塑料大棚和田间土壤金属淋溶损失较高,这一点通过土壤剖面中金属浓度分析得到了证实。这就提出了一个问题,即在评估植物提取的实际应用时,仅根据温室条件下植物对金属的吸收来估计是不合理的。在估计植物提取的持续时间时,有必要在田间酸性土壤中检查淋溶损失。