End-of-Life Care Research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210056. eCollection 2019.
Referral to specialized palliative care services (SPCS) occurs often late in the illness trajectory but may differ across cancer types. We examined differences between cancer types in the use and timing of referral to specialized palliative care services (SPCS) and in the reasons for non-referral.
We conducted a population-based mortality follow-back survey among physicians who certified a representative sample of deaths in Flanders, Belgium. We focused only on sampled death cases of cancer (n = 2392). The questionnaire asked about the use of the existing types of SPCS and the timing of referral to these services.
Response rate was 58% (1394/2392). Patients who died from breast, respiratory, head and neck, genitourinary or gastrointestinal cancer had higher chances of using SPCS compared to hematologic cancer patients. The most prevalent reason for non-referral was that regular care sufficiently addressed palliative and supportive care needs (51%). This differed significantly between cancer types ranging from 77,8% for breast cancer and 42.1% for hematologic cancer. A second prevalent reason for not using SPCS was that it was not meaningful (enough) (23.9%), particularly for hematologic malignancies (35,1%) and only in 5.3% for breast cancer.
Differences in referral across different types of cancer were found. Referral is more often delayed or not initiated for patients with hematologic cancer, possibly due to differences in illness trajectory. An influencing reason is that physicians perceive palliative care as not meaningful or not meaningful enough for these patients which may be linked to the uncertainty in the disease trajectory of hematologic malignancies.
向专门的姑息治疗服务(SPCS)转诊通常发生在疾病进程的晚期,但可能因癌症类型而异。我们研究了不同癌症类型在使用和转诊专门的姑息治疗服务(SPCS)的时间以及未转诊的原因方面的差异。
我们对在比利时佛兰德斯认证代表性死亡样本的医生进行了基于人群的死亡回溯调查。我们只关注抽样的癌症死亡病例(n=2392)。问卷询问了现有类型的 SPCS 的使用情况以及向这些服务转诊的时间。
回应率为 58%(1394/2392)。与血液癌患者相比,死于乳腺癌、呼吸系统癌、头颈部癌、泌尿生殖系统癌和胃肠道癌的患者更有可能使用 SPCS。未转诊的最常见原因是常规护理充分满足了姑息和支持性护理需求(51%)。这在癌症类型之间存在显著差异,从乳腺癌的 77.8%到血液癌的 42.1%不等。不使用 SPCS 的另一个常见原因是它没有意义(足够)(23.9%),特别是对于血液恶性肿瘤(35.1%),而在乳腺癌中仅为 5.3%。
发现不同类型的癌症之间存在转诊差异。对于血液癌患者,转诊更常被延迟或未启动,这可能是由于疾病轨迹的差异所致。一个影响因素是,医生认为姑息治疗对这些患者没有意义或不够有意义,这可能与血液恶性肿瘤疾病轨迹的不确定性有关。