Suppr超能文献

非胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病患者中,结构化自我血糖监测联合和不联合额外远程监护对总体血糖控制的影响:SMBG 研究,一项 12 个月的随机对照试验。

Effect of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose, with and without additional TeleCare support, on overall glycaemic control in non-insulin treated Type 2 diabetes: the SMBG Study, a 12-month randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Diabetes Research Group, Swansea University, Swansea.

Diabetes Centre, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2019 May;36(5):578-590. doi: 10.1111/dme.13899. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

Abstract

AIM

To examine the impact of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose, with or without TeleCare support, on glycaemic control in people with sub-optimally controlled Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a 12-month, multicentre, randomized controlled trial in people with established (>1 year) Type 2 diabetes not on insulin therapy, with sub-optimal glycaemic control [HbA ≥58 to ≤119 mmol/mol (≥7.5% to ≤13%)]. A total of 446 participants were randomized to a control group (n =151) receiving usual diabetes care, a group using structured self-monitoring of blood glucose alone (n =147) or a group using structured self-monitoring of blood glucose with additional monthly 'TeleCare' support (n =148). The primary outcome was HbA at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 323 participants (72%) completed the study; 116 (77%) in the control group, 99 (67%) in the self-monitoring of blood glucose alone group and 108 (73%) in the self-monitoring of blood glucose plus TeleCare group. Compared to baseline, the mean HbA was lower in all groups at 12 months, with reductions of 3.3 mmol/mol (95% CI -5.71 to -0.78) or 0.3% (95% CI -0.52 to -0.07; P=0.01) in the control group, 11.4 mmol/mol (95% CI -14.11 to -8.76) or 1.1% (-1.29 to -0.81; P<0.0001) in the group using self-monitoring of blood glucose alone and 12.8 mmol/mol (95% CI -15.34 to -10.31) or 1.2% (95% CI -1.40 to -0.94; P<0.0001) in the group using self-monitoring of blood glucose plus TeleCare. This represents a reduction in HbA of 8.9 mmol/mol (95% CI -11.97 to -5.84) or 0.8% (95% CI -1.10 to -0.54; P≤0.0001) with structured self-monitoring of blood glucose compared to the control group. Participants with lower baseline HbA , shorter duration of diabetes and higher educational achievement were more likely to achieve HbA ≤53 mmol/mol (7.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose provides clinical and statistical improvements in glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes. No additional benefit, over and above the use of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose, was observed in glycaemic control with the addition of once-monthly TeleCare support. (Clinical trial registration no.: ISRCTN21390608).

摘要

目的

研究在血糖自我监测(有或无远程护理支持)的情况下,对血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制的影响。

方法

我们在血糖控制不佳(HbA1c≥58 至≤119mmol/mol[≥7.5%至≤13%])且未接受胰岛素治疗的已确诊(>1 年)2 型糖尿病患者中开展了一项为期 12 个月的多中心、随机对照试验。共有 446 名参与者被随机分配至对照组(n=151),接受常规糖尿病护理,接受单纯血糖自我监测组(n=147)或接受血糖自我监测联合每月“远程护理”支持组(n=148)。主要结局为 12 个月时的 HbA1c。

结果

共有 323 名参与者(72%)完成了研究;对照组有 116 名(77%),单纯血糖自我监测组有 99 名(67%),血糖自我监测联合远程护理组有 108 名(73%)。与基线相比,所有组在 12 个月时的平均 HbA1c 均降低,对照组降低 3.3mmol/mol(95%CI-5.71 至-0.78)或 0.3%(95%CI-0.52 至-0.07;P=0.01),单纯血糖自我监测组降低 11.4mmol/mol(95%CI-14.11 至-8.76)或 1.1%(95%CI-1.29 至-0.81;P<0.0001),血糖自我监测联合远程护理组降低 12.8mmol/mol(95%CI-15.34 至-10.31)或 1.2%(95%CI-1.40 至-0.94;P<0.0001)。这表示与对照组相比,血糖自我监测可使 HbA1c 降低 8.9mmol/mol(95%CI-11.97 至-5.84)或 0.8%(95%CI-1.10 至-0.54;P≤0.0001)。基线 HbA1c 较低、糖尿病病程较短和受教育程度较高的患者更有可能达到 HbA1c≤53mmol/mol(7.0%)。

结论

血糖自我监测在 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制方面提供了临床和统计学上的改善。与单纯血糖自我监测相比,血糖自我监测联合每月一次的远程护理支持在血糖控制方面没有观察到额外的益处。(临床试验注册号:ISRCTN82106143)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e436/6593419/7ff1a3e841b4/DME-36-578-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验