Xu Tim, Mehta Ambar, Park Angela, Makary Martin A, Price David W
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
American Board of Medical Specialties, Chicago, IL.
Am J Med Qual. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):545-552. doi: 10.1177/1062860618822752. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
Physician credentialing processes aim to improve patient safety and quality, but little research has examined their direct relationship with surgical outcomes. Using national Medicare claims for 2009 to 2013, the authors studied the association between board certification and completion of Maintenance of Certification (MOC) requirements and surgeon rates of complications for 8 elective procedures. Exemplar surgeons were defined as those in the lowest decile of complication rates, and outlier surgeons were those in the highest decile. The analysis included 1.9 million procedures performed by 14 598 surgeons (64% orthopedics, 17% general surgery, 11% urology, 7% neurosurgery). Board-certified surgeons were less likely to be outliers (odds ratio 0.79 [0.66-0.94]). However, completion of MOC was not associated with differences in complication rates in orthopedic surgery or urology. Incorporating additional assessment methods into MOC, such as video evaluation of technical skills, retraining on state-of-the-art care, and peer review, may facilitate further improvements in surgical quality.
医生资格认证程序旨在提高患者安全性和医疗质量,但很少有研究探讨其与手术结果之间的直接关系。作者利用2009年至2013年的国家医疗保险索赔数据,研究了8种择期手术中委员会认证和继续医学教育认证(MOC)要求的完成情况与外科医生并发症发生率之间的关联。模范外科医生被定义为并发症发生率处于最低十分位数的医生,而异常外科医生则是并发症发生率处于最高十分位数的医生。该分析涵盖了14598名外科医生实施的190万例手术(64%为骨科手术,17%为普通外科手术,11%为泌尿外科手术,7%为神经外科手术)。获得委员会认证的外科医生成为异常值的可能性较小(优势比为0.79[0.66 - 0.94])。然而,在骨科手术或泌尿外科手术中,完成MOC与并发症发生率的差异并无关联。将额外的评估方法纳入MOC,如技术技能的视频评估、最新医疗护理的再培训以及同行评审,可能有助于进一步提高手术质量。