Suppr超能文献

三种基于移植肝组织的预后模型作为肝移植后肝细胞癌复发预测指标的比较:基于我们经验的分析

Comparison of 3 Explant-Based Prognostic Models as Predictors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: Analysis of Our Experience.

作者信息

Mirón Fernández I, León Díaz F J, Sánchez Segura J, Sánchez Pérez B, Pérez Daga J A, Fernández Aguilar J L, Montiel Casado M C, Santoyo Santoyo J

机构信息

Liver Transplant Unit, Regional Hospital, Málaga, Spain.

Liver Transplant Unit, Regional Hospital, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2019 Jan-Feb;51(1):80-82. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.132. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Tumor load is often underdiagnosed on radiological examination previous to liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocarcinoma (CHC). Thus, post-liver transplant explant analysis is required following transplantation to assess the risk of the recurrence of CHC. The objectives were to compare the characteristics of CHC on pre-LT radiological examination and explant histology and validate three models for the prediction of recurrence based on data from a cohort of patients treated in our hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken of 105 LTs for CHC performed in our unit between January 2006 and January 2015. The minimum follow-up was five years. The preoperative radiological tumor stage was compared to the explant-based histologic stage. Three prognostic models were validated using our cohort of patients.

RESULTS

Following Milan's criteria, the tumor load was underdiagnosed on pre-LT radiological examination in 20 patients, which accounted for 19% of the total sample. The 5-year overall recurrence was 6.6% for scores <4 and 33.3% for scores ≥4 according to Decaens' model; 7% for scores ≤7 and 25% for scores >7 in the Up-to-Seven model; and 3.6% for PCRS ≤0, 27.8% for PCRS1-2, and 100% for PCRS≥3 according to Chan's model. The predictive model for 5-year recurrence after LT with the greatest area under the curve was Chan's model (0.813 [95% CI: 0.650-0.977]) versus Decaens' model (0.674 [95% CI: 0.483-0.866]) and the Up-to-Seven model (0.481 [95% CI: 0.296-0.667]).

CONCLUSIONS

A pre-LT radiological examination leads to the underdiagnosis of tumor load, and the risk for recurrence must be recalculated following LT. In light of the results obtained, Chan's model is more accurate in predicting 5-year recurrence of CHC post-LT based on 3 levels of risk. New prognostic models are needed to optimize the prediction of recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocarcinoma.

摘要

未标注

在肝癌(CHC)肝移植(LT)前的放射学检查中,肿瘤负荷常常被漏诊。因此,肝移植术后需要进行移植肝外植体分析,以评估CHC复发风险。目的是比较LT前放射学检查和外植体组织学检查中CHC的特征,并基于我院治疗的一组患者的数据验证三种复发预测模型。

方法

对2006年1月至2015年1月在我科进行的105例CHC肝移植进行回顾性研究。最短随访时间为5年。将术前放射学肿瘤分期与基于外植体的组织学分期进行比较。使用我们的患者队列验证了三种预后模型。

结果

根据米兰标准,20例患者在LT前放射学检查中肿瘤负荷被漏诊,占总样本的19%。根据德凯恩模型,评分<4的患者5年总复发率为6.6%,评分≥4的患者为33.3%;在“Up-to-Seven”模型中,评分≤7的患者为7%,评分>7的患者为25%;根据陈模型,PCRS≤0的患者为3.6%,PCRS1-2的患者为27.8%,PCRS≥3的患者为100%。LT后5年复发预测模型中曲线下面积最大的是陈模型(0.813 [95% CI:0.650-0.977]),而德凯恩模型为(0.674 [95% CI:0.483-0.866]),“Up-to-Seven”模型为(0.481 [95% CI:0.296-0.667])。

结论

LT前的放射学检查会导致肿瘤负荷漏诊,LT后必须重新计算复发风险。根据所得结果,陈模型在基于3个风险水平预测LT后CHC的5年复发方面更为准确。需要新的预后模型来优化肝癌肝移植后复发的预测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验