Suppr超能文献

桡骨头置换与重建治疗肘关节恐怖三联征:一项系统评价和Meta分析

Radial head replacement versus reconstruction for the treatment of the terrible triad injury of the elbow: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Kyriacou Steven, Gupta Yash, Bains Harraj Kaur, Singh Harvinder Pal

机构信息

Clinical Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Apr;139(4):507-517. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03111-z. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE) remains challenging to manage and has been associated with high complication rates and poor outcomes. There is a trend towards performing radial head replacement (REP) in preference to radial head reconstruction (REC) as arthroplasty provides early stability and may allow mobilisation sooner, potentially resulting in a better functional outcome. This systematic review compares the outcome of patients with TTIE treated with either REC or REP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for studies published in English involving at least ten patients exclusively with a TTIE managed operatively, including both patients with either REC or REP. Data collection was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis protocol. The outcomes of interest were Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and range of motion (ROM). Post-operative complications were also compared.

RESULTS

9 studies involving 210 patients were included (98 REPs and 112 RECs). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.51) demonstrated between in the mean MEPS of the REP group (mean 88.6) and REC group (mean 88.5). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference demonstrated between the REP and REC groups in terms of ROM. The risk of re-operation was high in both the REP (18.4%) and REC (17.9%) group. The overall complication rate of all patients included in the study was high (65%).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable results with good outcomes in terms of functional scores and ROM can be achieved with both REP and REC when treating TTIE, although the re-operation rate for both remains relatively high. Given there is no apparent clear advantage between the two treatment groups, we would suggest that REC should be performed when a satisfactory fixation can be achieved as the longevity of REP in young patients with a TTIE is currently uncertain.

摘要

引言

肘关节恐怖三联征损伤(TTIE)的治疗仍然具有挑战性,且与高并发症发生率和不良预后相关。与桡骨头重建(REC)相比,目前存在一种倾向于进行桡骨头置换(REP)的趋势,因为关节成形术可提供早期稳定性,并可能使患者更早活动,从而有可能带来更好的功能结局。本系统评价比较了接受REC或REP治疗的TTIE患者的结局。

材料与方法

检索MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL数据库,查找以英文发表的研究,这些研究纳入至少10例仅接受手术治疗的TTIE患者,包括接受REC或REP治疗的患者。数据收集遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目协议。感兴趣的结局指标为梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)和活动范围(ROM)。同时比较术后并发症。

结果

纳入9项研究,共210例患者(98例接受REP,112例接受REC)。REP组的平均MEPS为88.6,REC组为88.5,两组之间未显示出统计学显著差异(p = 0.51)。同样,REP组和REC组在ROM方面也未显示出统计学显著差异。REP组(18.4%)和REC组(17.9%)再次手术的风险都很高。纳入研究的所有患者的总体并发症发生率较高(65%)。

结论

治疗TTIE时,REP和REC在功能评分和ROM方面均可取得相当的良好结果,尽管两者的再次手术率仍然相对较高。鉴于两个治疗组之间没有明显的明显优势,我们建议在能够实现满意固定时应进行REC,因为目前TTIE年轻患者中REP的使用寿命尚不确定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9305/6420892/4b148cc5932d/402_2019_3111_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Radial head replacement versus reconstruction for the treatment of the terrible triad injury of the elbow: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Apr;139(4):507-517. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03111-z. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
3
Fixation versus replacement of radial head in terrible triad: is there a difference in elbow stability and prognosis?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2128-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3331-x.
4
Complications of treating terrible triad injury of the elbow: a systematic review.
PLoS One. 2014 May 15;9(5):e97476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097476. eCollection 2014.
5
Replacement or repair of terrible triad of the elbow: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e13054. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013054.
6
Surgical treatment of the radial head is crucial for the outcome in terrible triad injuries of the elbow.
Bone Joint J. 2020 Dec;102-B(12):1620-1628. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0762.R1.
9
Radial Head Fixation vs Replacement in Terrible Triad: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Cohort Study with Patient Reported Outcome.
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Mar 19;54(Suppl 2):254-259. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00090-x. eCollection 2020 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in treatment and epidemiology of radial head fractures.
Shoulder Elbow. 2025 Jan 9:17585732241303156. doi: 10.1177/17585732241303156.
2
Terrible triad injury of the elbow joint treated with total elbow arthroplasty: a case report.
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Oct 1;4(1):113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.09.002. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Improved Understanding of Traumatic Complex Elbow Instability.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Sep 22;7(9). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00041. eCollection 2023 Sep 1.
5
The comparative performance of radial head prostheses in patients younger than and older than 50 years: a systematic review.
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022 Oct 19;3(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.09.008. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
[Terrible triad injuries].
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Sep;126(9):679-686. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01321-0. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Coronoid tip fractures in terrible triad injuries can be safely treated without fixation.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):5055-5064. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04889-9. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Management of Radial Head and Olecranon Fractures.
Open Orthop J. 2017 Mar 31;11:239-247. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711010239. eCollection 2017.
2
Terrible triad of the elbow: is it still a troublesome injury?
Injury. 2015 Dec;46 Suppl 8:S68-76. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30058-9.
3
Terrible triad of the elbow: treatment protocol and outcome in a series of eighteen cases.
Injury. 2015 Jan;46 Suppl 1:S8-12. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)70004-5. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
4
Radial head replacement or repair for the terrible triad of the elbow: which procedure is better?
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):644-8. doi: 10.1111/ans.13060. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Complications of treating terrible triad injury of the elbow: a systematic review.
PLoS One. 2014 May 15;9(5):e97476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097476. eCollection 2014.
6
Treatment strategy of terrible triad of the elbow: experience in Shanghai 6th People's Hospital.
Injury. 2014 Jun;45(6):942-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
7
Fixation versus replacement of radial head in terrible triad: is there a difference in elbow stability and prognosis?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2128-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3331-x.
8
Radial head reconstruction versus replacement in the treatment of terrible triad injuries of the elbow.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Oct;21(10):1336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
9
The effect of medial side repair in terrible triad injury of the elbow.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(2):96-101. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2012.2632.
10
Results of terrible triads in the elbow: the advantage of primary restoration of medial structure.
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Sep;15(5):612-9. doi: 10.1007/s00776-010-1515-8. Epub 2010 Oct 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验