Suppr超能文献

将有机朗肯循环与厌氧消化和联合热电联产相结合的环境可持续性。

Environmental sustainability of integrating the organic Rankin cycle with anaerobic digestion and combined heat and power generation.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.

Sustainable Industrial Systems, School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 25;658:684-696. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.190. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Abstract

Given the growing scarcity of primary energy resources, increasing the efficiency of energy conversion is one of the key challenges for optimising energy use. For this reason, low-grade or waste heat from various processes is becoming increasingly more attractive as an energy source. This study considers anaerobic digestion (AD) coupled with a combined heat and power plant (CHP) as a source of low-grade heat for electricity generation utilising an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system. The aim is to evaluate the environmental sustainability of such a system relative to the AD-CHP system without heat recovery. Ten real AD-CHP plants using cereal silage and animal slurry as feedstocks are considered for these purposes and their impacts have been estimated through life cycle assessment. The results suggest that systems with the ORC have lower impacts than those without it, but the average reductions are relatively small (1.6-5.8%). However, for the smaller plants fed mainly with animal slurry, climate change increases significantly (up to 27 times). The reduction in impacts is greater for the bigger plants where the surplus heat available for the ORC is higher. The impacts from the ORC plant are insignificant, with its electrical efficiency and lifespan showing little effect on the results. Small slurry-fed plants without the ORC have lower environmental impacts than the bigger silage-fed plants fitted with an ORC system for nine out of 13 categories considered; climate change is up to 32 times lower. They are only slightly worse than the bigger plants with the ORC for ozone depletion and human toxicity due to the economies of scale. Therefore, while there are clear benefits of fitting an ORC system to an AD-CHP plant, greater benefits can still be achieved by utilising waste feedstocks, such as animal slurry, instead of fitting an ORC to a plant utilising cereal silage.

摘要

鉴于初级能源资源日益稀缺,提高能源转换效率是优化能源利用的关键挑战之一。出于这个原因,各种工艺产生的低品位或废热作为能源变得越来越有吸引力。本研究将厌氧消化(AD)与热电联产(CHP)相结合,作为利用有机朗肯循环(ORC)系统发电的低品位热源。目的是评估相对于没有热回收的 AD-CHP 系统,这种系统的环境可持续性。为此,考虑了使用谷物青贮料和动物粪浆作为饲料的十个实际 AD-CHP 工厂,并通过生命周期评估估算了它们的影响。结果表明,具有 ORC 的系统比没有 ORC 的系统的影响更低,但平均减少幅度相对较小(1.6-5.8%)。然而,对于主要以动物粪浆为食的较小工厂,气候变化显著增加(高达 27 倍)。对于拥有更高剩余热量可用于 ORC 的较大工厂,减少的影响更大。ORC 工厂的影响并不显著,其电效率和使用寿命对结果影响不大。对于没有 ORC 的小型粪浆工厂,在考虑的 13 个类别中有 9 个的环境影响低于配备 ORC 系统的较大青贮工厂;气候变化低至 32 倍。由于规模经济,它们在臭氧消耗和人类毒性方面仅略逊于配备 ORC 系统的较大工厂。因此,虽然为 AD-CHP 工厂配备 ORC 系统有明显的好处,但通过利用动物粪浆等废物饲料,而不是为利用谷物青贮料的工厂配备 ORC,仍可以获得更大的好处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验