School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
J Biomech. 2019 Feb 14;84:204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.048. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
Clinical observations have suggested that limited hamstring flexibility may be associated with sagittal spinal curvatures in spine flexed postures. Thus, limited hamstring flexibility may be related to large amounts of spine flexion in "slumped" sitting postures which could contribute to low back pain and injury. The aim of this study was to determine if hamstring and pelvic flexibility are associated with flexed sitting postures using a backless office chair. Forty-one healthy female adults aged 18-69 years were recruited. Subjects performed the Sit-and-Reach test to determine maximum flexibility values and lumbar and pelvic angles were measured with accelerometers. Participants then completed a standardized typing task for a 10-minute sitting trial at an ergonomically adjusted workstation. The results showed no association between hamstring flexibility and seated lumbar spine and pelvic angles (p = 0.999, η = 0.000; p = 0.901, η = 0.006). Greater pelvic flexibility was associated with a more upright lumbar sitting posture (p = 0.023; η = 0.132) but with no specific pelvic sitting posture (p = 0.660; η = 0.005). Different movement strategies during the Sit-and-Reach test were detected: all participants moved through their lumbar spine; but only those with 'excellent' flexibility also used their pelvis. Individuals in the 'excellent' flexibility group were significantly shorter than those with 'poor' and 'good' flexibility (p = 0.020; η = 0.190). In conclusion, hamstring flexibility does not influence sitting posture but pelvic flexibility does. Other factors such as acetabulofemoral joint limitations, consciousness of posture, or the seat itself may also influence sitting posture. Different movement strategies as well as height appear to contribute to the Sit-and-Reach test which should be researched further.
临床观察表明,腘绳肌柔韧性有限可能与脊柱弯曲的矢状面有关。因此,腘绳肌柔韧性有限可能与“弯腰”坐姿中大量的脊柱弯曲有关,这可能导致下腰痛和损伤。本研究旨在确定使用无靠背办公椅时,腘绳肌和骨盆的柔韧性是否与弯曲坐姿有关。招募了 41 名年龄在 18 至 69 岁的健康成年女性。受试者进行坐立前伸测试以确定最大柔韧性值,并用加速度计测量腰椎和骨盆角度。然后,参与者在符合人体工程学调整的工作站上完成 10 分钟坐姿标准打字任务。结果显示,腘绳肌柔韧性与坐姿腰椎和骨盆角度之间没有关联(p=0.999,η=0.000;p=0.901,η=0.006)。更大的骨盆柔韧性与更直立的腰椎坐姿相关(p=0.023;η=0.132),但与特定的骨盆坐姿无关(p=0.660;η=0.005)。在坐立前伸测试中检测到不同的运动策略:所有参与者都通过腰椎移动;但只有那些“优秀”柔韧性的人也使用了骨盆。在“优秀”柔韧性组的个体明显比“较差”和“较好”柔韧性组的个体更矮(p=0.020;η=0.190)。总之,腘绳肌柔韧性不影响坐姿,但骨盆柔韧性会影响坐姿。其他因素,如髋臼股骨关节限制、姿势意识或座椅本身,也可能影响坐姿。不同的运动策略以及身高似乎都有助于坐立前伸测试,这需要进一步研究。