Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Department of Hematology, Transplantation Program, Marseille, France.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jul;54(7):1164-1167. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0453-0. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
We propose to test whether the new refined Minnesota risk score, which represents a new tool for acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (aGVHD) grading, may be useful to predict the final outcome of patients with aGVHD after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). Hundred consecutive patients with grade 2-4 aGVHD were included. Twenty-two percent of the patients had high-risk (HR) aGVHD and had a lower chance to respond at day 28: 41% of non-responders (NR) were in the HR vs 13% in the standard-risk (SR) group (p = 0.003). By multivariate analysis, grade 3-4 aGVHD according to the traditional Keystone classification was the main independent predictor of non-response to front-line treatment at day 28, while HR aGVHD by the new refined Minnesota score remained the main independent variable associated with adverse NRM and OS. The new Minnesota refined risk score is a useful tool to predict the outcome of patients with aGVHD after Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy. Due to the few patients exchanging between categories in the two classifications, it is not possible to discriminate which system better predicts the outcome of patients with aGVHD in the setting of Haplo-SCT. Extending these preliminary observations to a larger cohort is warranted.
我们提出测试新的改良明尼苏达风险评分,这是一种急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)分级的新工具,是否可以预测接受环磷酰胺后单倍体造血干细胞移植(Haplo-SCT)的患者发生 aGVHD 的最终结局。共纳入 100 例 2-4 级 aGVHD 患者。22%的患者存在高危(HR)aGVHD,在第 28 天应答的可能性较低:41%的无应答者(NR)处于 HR 组,而标准风险(SR)组为 13%(p=0.003)。多变量分析显示,根据传统 Keystone 分类的 3-4 级 aGVHD 是第 28 天一线治疗无应答的主要独立预测因子,而新的改良明尼苏达评分的 HR aGVHD 仍然是与不良 NRM 和 OS 相关的主要独立变量。新的改良明尼苏达风险评分是预测接受环磷酰胺后单倍体造血干细胞移植的患者发生 aGVHD 结局的有用工具。由于两种分类中类别之间的患者交换较少,因此无法区分哪种系统更能预测 Haplo-SCT 中 aGVHD 患者的结局。有必要将这些初步观察结果扩展到更大的队列中。