H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Jul;12(4):361-370. doi: 10.1111/cts.12617. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
For regulatory approval of a new medicine, the gold standard for demonstration of efficacy has traditionally been a minimum of two positive, adequate, and well-controlled clinical trials. Nevertheless, drugs to treat cancer and rare diseases are usually approved based on a single and often uncontrolled pivotal trial. In contrast, little is known about single pivotal trial approvals for non-orphan, non-oncology drugs. Between 2012 and 2016, 23 novel therapeutic drugs were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for 27 non-orphan, non-oncology indications each based on a single pivotal trial. Although there was considerable variation in the nature and strength of the efficacy evidence supporting these drug approvals, the majority (85%) of the pivotal trials were randomized and controlled. For all superiority trials, the primary outcome was met with a statistical significance of P ≤ 0.005. Most approvals were supported by additional efficacy data from nonpivotal studies.
对于新药物的监管批准,传统上证明疗效的金标准是至少进行两项阳性、充分和良好对照的临床试验。然而,治疗癌症和罕见病的药物通常基于一项单一的、且通常是非对照的关键性试验获得批准。相比之下,对于非孤儿、非肿瘤药物的单一关键性试验批准,人们知之甚少。在 2012 年至 2016 年期间,美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 和/或欧洲药品管理局 (EMA) 批准了 23 种新的治疗药物,用于 27 种非孤儿、非肿瘤适应症,每种药物的批准均基于一项单一的关键性试验。尽管支持这些药物批准的疗效证据在性质和强度上存在相当大的差异,但大多数 (85%) 关键性试验是随机对照的。对于所有优势试验,主要结局均达到统计学显著性 P ≤ 0.005。大多数批准都得到了来自非关键性研究的额外疗效数据的支持。