Department of Orthopedics, Division of Physical Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, the United States.
Department of Orthopedics, Division of Physical Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, the United States.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jul;100(7):1324-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.025. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
To synthesize literature about the effect of early physical therapy (PT) for acute low back pain (LBP) on subsequent health services utilization (HSU), compared to delayed PT or usual care.
Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase) were searched from their inception to May 2018.
Study selection included randomized control trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies that investigated the association between early PT and HSU compared to delayed PT or usual care. Two independent authors screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for inclusion based on eligibility criteria, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Eleven out of 1146 articles were included.
Two independent reviewers extracted data on participants, timing of PT, comparisons to delayed PT or usual care, and downstream HSU, and a third reviewer assessed the information to ensure accuracy and reach consensus. Risk of bias was assessed with the Downs and Black checklist using the same method.
Eleven studies met eligibility criteria. Early PT is within 30 days of the index visit for acute LBP. Five out of 6 studies that compared early PT to delayed PT found that early PT reduces future HSU. Random effects meta-analysis indicated a significant reduction in opioid use, spine injection, and spine surgery. Five studies compared early PT to usual care and reported mixed results.
Early PT for acute LBP may reduce HSU, cost, and opioid use, and improve health care efficiency. This review may assist patients, health care providers, health care systems, and third-party payers in making decisions for the treatment of acute LBP.
综合有关急性腰痛(LBP)早期物理治疗(PT)对后续健康服务利用(HSU)影响的文献,与延迟 PT 或常规护理相比。
从建立到 2018 年 5 月,电子数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase)进行了搜索。
研究选择包括随机对照试验和前瞻性及回顾性队列研究,这些研究调查了早期 PT 与延迟 PT 或常规护理相比与 HSU 的相关性。两名独立作者根据入选标准筛选标题、摘要和全文文章,并由第三名作者解决差异。从 1146 篇文章中选出 11 篇。
两名独立的综述者提取了关于参与者、PT 时机、与延迟 PT 或常规护理的比较以及下游 HSU 的数据,第三名综述者评估信息以确保准确性并达成共识。使用相同的方法,使用唐斯和布莱克清单评估偏倚风险。
11 项研究符合入选标准。早期 PT 是指急性 LBP 指数就诊后 30 天内。6 项比较早期 PT 与延迟 PT 的研究中有 5 项发现早期 PT 可减少未来 HSU。随机效应荟萃分析表明,阿片类药物使用、脊柱注射和脊柱手术显著减少。5 项研究将早期 PT 与常规护理进行比较,报告结果不一。
急性 LBP 的早期 PT 可能会减少 HSU、成本和阿片类药物的使用,并提高医疗保健效率。这篇综述可能有助于患者、医疗保健提供者、医疗保健系统和第三方支付者做出急性 LBP 治疗决策。