Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Center for Alcohol Research in Epigenetics (CARE), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 8;92:271-278. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
Studies suggest that individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) display abnormal neural error-processing, measured via the error-related negativity (ERN). The nature of the error-related abnormalities in AUD is unclear, however, as prior research has yielded discrepant findings. In addition, no study to date has attempted to characterize the dispositional nature of the ERN in AUD and directly test to what extent ERN amplitude reflects a risk factor, disease marker, and/or scar of AUD psychopathology. The current study compared ERN amplitude across 244 adult volunteers in the following five groups: 1) current AUD (n = 39), 2) AUD in remission (n = 60), 3) at-risk for AUD (n = 43), 4) psychiatric controls with comparable rates of internalizing psychopathology as the AUD groups (n = 53), and 5) healthy controls with no lifetime history of psychopathology (n = 49). Risk for AUD was defined as a positive, first-degree family history. All participants completed a well-validated flanker task, designed to robustly elicit the ERN, during continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) data collection. Results indicated that individuals with current AUD displayed smaller ERNs compared with individuals at-risk for AUD, with AUD in remission, psychiatric controls, and healthy controls. There were no differences amongst any of the other groups. This suggests that a blunted ERN may be concomitant with current AUD psychopathology and relatedly, a novel neurobiological AUD treatment target and/or objective marker of AUD disease status.
研究表明,患有酒精使用障碍(AUD)的个体表现出异常的神经错误处理,这可以通过错误相关负波(ERN)来测量。然而,AUD 中的错误相关异常的性质尚不清楚,因为先前的研究得出了不一致的发现。此外,迄今为止,尚无研究试图描述 AUD 中 ERN 的性格特质,并直接测试 ERN 幅度在多大程度上反映了 AUD 精神病理学的风险因素、疾病标志物和/或痕迹。本研究比较了以下五个组的 244 名成年志愿者的 ERN 幅度:1)当前 AUD(n=39),2)AUD 缓解期(n=60),3)有 AUD 风险(n=43),4)精神病学对照者,其内化精神病理学的比率与 AUD 组相当(n=53),5)无终生精神病史的健康对照者(n=49)。AUD 风险定义为阳性一级家族史。所有参与者都在连续脑电图(EEG)数据采集期间完成了一项经过充分验证的侧抑制任务,旨在可靠地引出 ERN。结果表明,与有 AUD 风险的个体相比,当前患有 AUD 的个体的 ERN 较小,而 AUD 缓解期、精神病学对照者和健康对照者的 ERN 则没有差异。这表明,迟钝的 ERN 可能与当前的 AUD 精神病理学同时发生,并且是 AUD 神经生物学治疗靶点和/或 AUD 疾病状态的客观标志物。