• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压电外科手术与传统方法进行牙槽骨成形术的比较。

Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Method Alveoloplasty.

作者信息

Gangwani Khushal D, Shetty Lakshmi, Kulkarni Deepak, Seshagiri Ratnadeepika, Chopra Ratima

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth's, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul-Dec;8(2):181-187. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_162_18.

DOI:10.4103/ams.ams_162_18
PMID:30693229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6327828/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Conventional alveoloplasty procedure using manual instruments results in higher resorption of the residual alveolar ridge, which is unsuitable for denture construction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of piezosurgery-assisted alveoloplasty using minimally invasive technique compared to that of the conventional technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a comparative study. The study sample consisted of 35 edentulous patients with bilateral bony spicules requiring alveoloplasty. The primary outcome variables assessed were time required for alveoloplasty, postoperative pain using visual analogue scale (VAS), and postoperative healing using Landry, Turnbull, and Howley healing index. The differences between the outcome variables were statistically analyzed using paired -test.

RESULTS

The participants consisted of 35 patients (25 men and 10 women; age range: 38-83 years) diagnosed with bilateral bony spicules on the edentulous alveolar ridge. There was a statistically highly significant difference between both groups with respect to the outcome variables such as time required, VAS at 2 day, and healing index at 7 day with higher mean of time required (in sec), higher mean of VAS, and lower healing index for conventional group as compared to piezo group ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Alveoloplasty done using piezosurgery not only reduces patient's postoperative discomfort but also maintains the alveolar bone integrity by not disturbing the soft-tissue and hard-tissue architecture, allowing faster healing of tissues, which makes the future prosthesis replacement easier.

摘要

目的

使用手动器械进行的传统牙槽骨修整术会导致剩余牙槽嵴更高程度的吸收,这不适用于义齿修复。本研究的目的是评估与传统技术相比,采用微创技术的压电手术辅助牙槽骨修整术的效果。

材料与方法

这是一项对比研究。研究样本包括35例双侧存在骨尖且需要进行牙槽骨修整术的无牙患者。评估的主要结果变量包括牙槽骨修整术所需时间、使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的术后疼痛以及使用兰德里、特恩布尔和豪利愈合指数评估的术后愈合情况。使用配对t检验对结果变量之间的差异进行统计学分析。

结果

参与者包括35例患者(25名男性和10名女性;年龄范围:38 - 83岁),诊断为无牙牙槽嵴双侧存在骨尖。两组在诸如所需时间、第2天的VAS以及第7天的愈合指数等结果变量方面存在统计学上的高度显著差异,传统组的所需时间平均值(以秒为单位)更高、VAS平均值更高且愈合指数更低,与压电组相比(P < 0.05)。

结论

使用压电手术进行牙槽骨修整术不仅能减轻患者术后不适,还能通过不干扰软组织和硬组织结构来维持牙槽骨完整性,使组织愈合更快,这使得未来的义齿修复更容易。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/1fe5d4d71160/AMS-8-181-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/0471545cd66f/AMS-8-181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/a3eb6a96f278/AMS-8-181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/6ee4d8c95308/AMS-8-181-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/54b65cf2d9aa/AMS-8-181-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/c61681af3a75/AMS-8-181-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/53442f888af2/AMS-8-181-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/6986840690ad/AMS-8-181-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/eaed81e3dd1a/AMS-8-181-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/27844e4a0803/AMS-8-181-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/611f04980f92/AMS-8-181-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/43f0c153836c/AMS-8-181-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/1fe5d4d71160/AMS-8-181-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/0471545cd66f/AMS-8-181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/a3eb6a96f278/AMS-8-181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/6ee4d8c95308/AMS-8-181-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/54b65cf2d9aa/AMS-8-181-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/c61681af3a75/AMS-8-181-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/53442f888af2/AMS-8-181-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/6986840690ad/AMS-8-181-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/eaed81e3dd1a/AMS-8-181-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/27844e4a0803/AMS-8-181-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/611f04980f92/AMS-8-181-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/43f0c153836c/AMS-8-181-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3529/6327828/1fe5d4d71160/AMS-8-181-g014.jpg