Ihde Stefan, Ihde Antonina
International Implant Foundation, Head of Dental Implant Faculty, Munich, Germany.
OSA Simpladent, CG-85315 Sv.Stefan/Tudorovici, Montenegro.
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul-Dec;8(2):365-368. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_224_18.
This article explains, based on a long-term observation, the hard-tissue reaction to different endosseous implant surfaces and different implant designs. A patient who had received a full maxillary implant-supported restoration on basal implants and compression screws followed by immediate loading presented no clinical problems at the 20-year follow-up, but the X-ray examination revealed different hard tissue reactions to different implant types. No bone loss was found around lateral basal implants with fully polished vertical aspects, whereas crater-like bone loss was observed around the vertical shafts of implants with a roughened surface and macromechanical retentions. The case seems to indicate that roughened surfaces around the crestal transmucosal aspect of a dental implant may promote vertical bone loss and peri-implantitis.
本文基于长期观察,阐述了不同骨内种植体表面及不同种植体设计引发的硬组织反应。一名患者接受了上颌全口种植体支持修复,采用基台种植体和加压螺钉并即刻负重,在20年随访时未出现临床问题,但X线检查显示不同种植体类型引发了不同的硬组织反应。垂直面完全抛光的外侧基台种植体周围未发现骨吸收,而表面粗糙且有宏观机械固位结构的种植体垂直杆周围观察到火山口样骨吸收。该病例似乎表明,牙种植体经黏膜部分周围的粗糙表面可能会促进垂直骨吸收和种植体周围炎。