Departments of Urology, Wayne State University , Detroit.
University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan.
J Urol. 2019 May;201(5):923-928. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000059.
We investigated how magnetic resonance imaging and post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy impact decision making in men considering active surveillance.
We reviewed the records of men in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative with newly diagnosed favorable risk prostate cancer. Following diagnostic biopsy the men were classified into 3 groups, including group 1-no magnetic resonance imaging, group 2-magnetic resonance imaging only and group 3-magnetic resonance imaging/post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy. For the purposes of counseling and shared decision making magnetic resonance imaging results were deemed reassuring (PI-RADS™ [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System] 3 or less) or nonreassuring (PI-RADS 4 or greater). Similarly, if the diagnostic biopsy was GG (Grade Group) 1, post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy results were deemed nonreassuring if there was any amount of GG 2 or greater. If the diagnostic biopsy was GG 2, post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy results were deemed nonreassuring if more than 3 cores were GG 2, or there was more than 50% GG 2 in any individual core or any volume of GG 3 or greater.
Of 1,461 men with favorable risk prostate cancer 1,223 (84%) did not undergo magnetic resonance imaging, 157 (11%) underwent magnetic resonance imaging alone and 81 (6%) underwent magnetic resonance imaging and post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy. Of the men who underwent magnetic resonance imaging alone more with reassuring findings elected active surveillance than men with nonreassuring or magnetic resonance imaging findings (74% vs 35% and 42%, respectively). The highest rate of active surveillance was noted in men with reassuring post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy regardless of whether magnetic resonance imaging was reassuring or nonreassuring (93% and 96%, respectively).
Magnetic resonance imaging and post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy drive decision making in men with newly diagnosed, favorable risk prostate cancer. Post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsy is a stronger driver of decision making than magnetic resonance imaging alone. This was demonstrated by the more than 90% of men with reassuring post-magnetic resonance imaging biopsies who elected active surveillance regardless of magnetic resonance imaging results.
我们研究了磁共振成像(MRI)和 MRI 后活检对考虑主动监测的男性决策的影响。
我们回顾了密歇根泌尿外科学术改进协作组织中患有新诊断的低危前列腺癌的男性的记录。在诊断性活检后,这些男性被分为 3 组,包括组 1(无 MRI)、组 2(仅 MRI)和组 3(MRI 后活检)。为了进行咨询和共同决策,MRI 结果被认为是令人放心的(PI-RADS™[前列腺影像报告和数据系统]3 或更低)或不令人放心的(PI-RADS 4 或更高)。同样,如果诊断性活检为 GG1(等级组),如果 MRI 后活检有任何数量的 GG2 或更高,则结果被认为不令人放心。如果诊断性活检为 GG2,如果有超过 3 个核心为 GG2,或者在任何一个核心中有超过 50%的 GG2,或者有任何体积的 GG3 或更高,则 MRI 后活检结果被认为不令人放心。
在 1461 名患有低危前列腺癌的男性中,1223 名(84%)未行 MRI,157 名(11%)仅行 MRI,81 名(6%)行 MRI 后活检。在仅行 MRI 的男性中,更多具有令人放心的发现者选择主动监测,而不是具有不令人放心或 MRI 发现的男性(分别为 74%、35%和 42%)。无论 MRI 是否令人放心,具有令人放心的 MRI 后活检的男性的主动监测率最高(分别为 93%和 96%)。
MRI 和 MRI 后活检驱动了新诊断的低危前列腺癌男性的决策。与仅 MRI 相比,MRI 后活检是决策的更强驱动因素。这一点在 90%以上的具有令人放心的 MRI 后活检的男性中得到了证明,无论 MRI 结果如何,他们都选择了主动监测。