Suppr超能文献

局部晚期直肠癌的新辅助放化疗:一项基于网络荟萃分析的文献系统综述

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature with network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Min, Chen Liang-Zhou, Xu Lin, Zhang Jin-Song, Song Xue

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiamen 361009, China,

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jan 15;11:741-758. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S189445. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) prior to surgery is a standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, but the optimum regime is not conclusive. This meta-analysis evaluated various CRT regimens with regard to the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) and toxic effects of grade ≥3.

METHODS

The databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared neoadjuvant CRT regimes for treating patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, published before 28 December 2017. The primary end points were pCR and toxic effects. A network meta-analysis was applied.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs (with 5,599 participants) involving the following eight regimens were included: fluorouracil (5FU) alone, or 5FU with oxaliplatin (OXA), cisplatin, or irinotecan (CPT-11); capecitabine (CAP) alone, or CAP with OXA or CPT-11; and CPT-11 with combined tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate. The rate of pCR associated with CAP + OXA was significantly higher compared with 5FU alone; there were no significant differences among the other regimens. The toxicity of 5FU + OXA or CAP + OXA was significantly worse than that of 5FU alone or CAP alone. CAP + OXA and CAP were ranked, respectively, the most and second most effective regimens in terms of pCR rate. 5FU alone and CAP alone likely had the lowest and second lowest toxicity, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among the currently available CRT regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer, this meta-analysis indicated that CAP + OXA provides the superior clinical results. Adding OXA to 5FU or CAP significantly increases toxicity.

摘要

背景

术前新辅助放化疗(CRT)是局部晚期直肠癌的标准治疗方法,但最佳方案尚无定论。本荟萃分析评估了各种CRT方案的病理完全缓解(pCR)率和≥3级毒性反应。

方法

检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase数据库,查找2017年12月28日前发表的比较新辅助CRT方案治疗局部晚期直肠癌患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要终点是pCR和毒性反应。应用网状荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了14项RCT(共5599名参与者),涉及以下8种方案:单独使用氟尿嘧啶(5FU),或5FU联合奥沙利铂(OXA)、顺铂或伊立替康(CPT-11);单独使用卡培他滨(CAP),或CAP联合OXA或CPT-11;以及CPT-11联合替加氟、5-氯-2,4-二羟基吡啶和奥索酸钾。与单独使用5FU相比,CAP + OXA的pCR率显著更高;其他方案之间无显著差异。5FU + OXA或CAP + OXA的毒性显著高于单独使用5FU或CAP。就pCR率而言,CAP + OXA和CAP分别被列为最有效和第二有效的方案。单独使用5FU和单独使用CAP可能分别具有最低和第二低的毒性。

结论

在目前用于局部晚期直肠癌的CRT方案中,本荟萃分析表明CAP + OXA提供了更好的临床结果。在5FU或CAP中添加OXA会显著增加毒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3464/6339644/e1dfe7290d37/cmar-11-741Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验