School of Nursing, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Int Wound J. 2019 Jun;16(3):601-620. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13069. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
This literature review aimed to provide a narrative review of evidence on validity of clinical and microbial indicators of infection and to gain insights into the diagnosis of infection in chronic leg ulcers (CLUs). A search was conducted in Cinahl, Medline, the Cochrane Library databases, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Pubmed, PsycINFO, ProQuest dissertations, and Google Scholar from January 1990 to July 2017. The inclusion criteria were original studies, systematic reviews, and consensus documents focused on "infection" in CLUs, English language, clinical and community settings, and human. The reviewed studies were inconsistent in criteria for infection between investigated wound types and lack of specificity regarding wound types. There were few studies investigating the criteria for diagnosis of infection in leg ulcers. The identification of leg ulcer infection still remains problematic and relies on out-of-date and not uniform evidence. Literature in this area was mostly limited to level III and IV evidence based on The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Levels of Evidence, or expert opinion. This literature review showed seven clinical signs and symptoms that could be diagnostic for infection in CLUs, including: new, increased, or altered ulcer pain; malodour; increased ulcer area; wound breakdown, delayed or non-healing; and erythema and increased local temperature, whilst the microbial indicators used to diagnose infected leg ulcers were varied and regarded as less important.
这篇文献综述旨在对感染的临床和微生物学指标的有效性证据进行叙述性回顾,并深入了解慢性腿部溃疡(CLU)感染的诊断。从 1990 年 1 月到 2017 年 7 月,我们在 Cinahl、Medline、Cochrane 图书馆数据库、Embase、Web of Science、ScienceDirect、Pubmed、PsycINFO、ProQuest 论文和 Google Scholar 中进行了检索。纳入标准为关注 CLU 中“感染”的原始研究、系统评价和共识文件,语言为英文,临床和社区环境,以及人类。综述研究中对研究性伤口类型的感染标准不一致,对伤口类型缺乏特异性。很少有研究调查腿部溃疡感染的诊断标准。腿部溃疡感染的识别仍然存在问题,并且依赖于过时且不统一的证据。这方面的文献主要限于基于澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会证据水平的 III 级和 IV 级证据,或专家意见。这篇文献综述显示了 7 种可能对 CLU 感染具有诊断意义的临床体征和症状,包括:新的、增加的或改变的溃疡疼痛;恶臭;溃疡面积增加;伤口破裂、延迟或不愈合;红斑和局部温度升高,而用于诊断感染性腿部溃疡的微生物指标则各不相同,被认为不太重要。