Li N, Zhang J, Yang L, Wu M D, Li G Q
The State Key Lab of Agricultural Microbiology and the Key Laboratory of Phytopathology of Hubei Province, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Plant Dis. 2015 Feb;99(2):283. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-03-14-0256-PDN.
A tomato field in Qianjiang County, Hubei Province, China, was surveyed for gray mold in April 2013. Diseased leaves with V-shaped lesions along the margin and masses of grayish hyphae and conidia on the surface were collected from different plants. Eight Botrytis isolates were obtained from eight symptomatic leaves by plating the conidia from each leaf onto potato dextrose agar (PDA). A representative isolate (No. 116) was compared to two reference isolates, B. cinerea B05.10 (from Z. H. Ma, Zhejiang University, China) and B. pseudocinerea 10091 (from A. S. Walker, INRA, France) for morpho-cultural and molecular features. On PDA at 20°C, isolate 116 grew 13.8 mm/day (n = 9), which was similar to those of isolates 10091 (13.7 mm/day), and B05.10 (14.6 mm/day). The isolates all formed black sclerotia of similar shape and size (2 to 13 × 1 to 7 mm). To induce conidia production, the isolates each were inoculated onto tomato fruit (cv. Hezuo 903, Jiangsu Seed Co., China) using colonized agar plugs (each 6 mm in diameter), with four plugs per fruit and four fruits tested per isolate. After incubation of the fruit for 10 days (20°C), abundant conidia were produced on the fruit surface. The conidial size of isolate 116 (6.8 to 14.3 × 6.1 to 10.2 μm) was similar to that of isolates 10091 (7.7 to 12.2 × 7.0 to 9.8 μm) and B05.10 (7.0 to 14 × 6.6 to 10.5 μm). The three isolates were indistinguishable morphologically. The sequences of each of four nuclear genes (Bc-hch, G3PDH, HSP60, and MS547) and the microsatellite Bc6 locus (1,4) were determined and analyzed for each isolate. DNA was extracted from mycelium of each isolate and used as a template to amplify each gene by PCR using specific primers (1,2,4). Bc-hch-RFLP genotyping of the 1,171-bp amplicon (2,4) showed that isolates 116 and 10091 had a 601-bp DNA product, whereas B05.10 had a 517-bp product. The G3PDH, HSP60, and MS547 sequences of isolate 116 (GenBank Accession Nos. KJ534270, KJ534271, and KJ534273, respectively) and those of B. aclada, B. calthae, B. cinerea, B. pseudocinerea, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (3) were used for phylogenetic analysis. Isolate 116 and eight B. pseudocinerea isolates formed a subclade with 100% bootstrap support. Furthermore, two DNA markers, 86 bp for isolates 116 and 10091 vs. 170 bp for B05.10 were identified at the Bc6 locus. These results suggest that isolate 116 belongs to B. pseudocinerea (1,4). Pathogenicity of each isolate was tested by inoculation of each of five newly expanded tomato leaves on a 50-day-old plant (cv. Hezuo 903, Jiangsu Seed Co) with a 20-μl droplet of a conidial suspension (1 × 10 conidia/ml), using a pipette. Five noninoculated control leaves were treated similarly with water. The plants were all maintained at 20°C and 100% RH for 72 h, and lesion diameter was then measured. While control leaves remained asymptomatic, leaves inoculated with isolates 116, 10091, and B05.10 developed necrotic lesions averaging 19 to 20 mm in diameter. A fungus re-isolated from the lesions on isolate-116-inoculated leaves formed colonies with morphology identical to that of the original isolate 116. To our knowledge, this is the first report of B. pseudocinerea on tomato in China. The remaining seven isolates were identified as B. cinerea based on Bc-hch-RFLP genotyping (data not shown), suggesting that B. pseudocinerea may infect tomato plants at a low frequency in this region of China. References: (1) E. Fournier et al. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2:253, 2002. (2) E. Fournier et al. Mycologia 95:251, 2003. (3) P. R. Johnston et al. Plant Pathol. 63:888, 2014. (4) A. S. Walker et al. Phytopathology 101:1433, 2011.
2013年4月,对中国湖北省潜江县的一块番茄田进行了灰霉病调查。从不同植株上采集了边缘有V形病斑且表面有大量灰色菌丝和分生孢子的病叶。通过将每片叶子上的分生孢子接种到马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂(PDA)上,从八片有症状的叶子中获得了八个葡萄孢菌分离株。将一个代表性分离株(编号116)与两个参考分离株,即灰葡萄孢B05.10(来自中国浙江大学的马忠华)和拟灰葡萄孢10091(来自法国国家农业研究院的A. S. 沃克)进行形态培养和分子特征比较。在20°C的PDA上,分离株116每天生长13.8毫米(n = 9),与分离株10091(13.7毫米/天)和B05.10(14.6毫米/天)相似。这些分离株均形成了形状和大小相似(2至13×1至7毫米)的黑色菌核。为了诱导分生孢子产生,使用定殖琼脂块(每个直径6毫米)将每个分离株接种到番茄果实(品种为合作903,中国江苏种子公司)上,每个果实接种四个琼脂块,每个分离株测试四个果实。果实于20°C培养10天后,在果实表面产生了大量分生孢子。分离株116的分生孢子大小(6.8至14.3×6.1至10.2微米)与分离株10091(7.7至12.2×7.0至9.8微米)和B05.10(7.0至14×6.6至10.5微米)相似。这三个分离株在形态上无法区分。对每个分离株的四个核基因(Bc-hch、G3PDH、HSP60和MS547)以及微卫星Bc6位点(1,4)的序列进行了测定和分析。从每个分离株的菌丝体中提取DNA,并用作模板,使用特异性引物(1,2,4)通过PCR扩增每个基因。对1171碱基对扩增子(2,4)进行Bc-hch-RFLP基因分型显示,分离株116和10091有一个601碱基对的DNA产物,而B05.10有一个517碱基对的产物。分离株116的G3PDH、HSP60和MS547序列(GenBank登录号分别为KJ534270、KJ534271和KJ534273)以及匐柄霉、驴蹄草葡萄孢、灰葡萄孢、拟灰葡萄孢和核盘菌的序列(3)用于系统发育分析。分离株116和八个拟灰葡萄孢分离株形成了一个有100%自展支持的亚分支。此外,在Bc6位点鉴定出两个DNA标记,分离株116和10091为86碱基对,而B05.10为170碱基对。这些结果表明分离株116属于拟灰葡萄孢(1,4)。通过用移液器将20微升分生孢子悬浮液(1×10分生孢子/毫升)滴在50日龄植株(品种为合作903,中国江苏种子公司)上刚展开的五片番茄叶上,对每个分离株的致病性进行了测试。五片未接种的对照叶同样用水处理。将植株全部在20°C和100%相对湿度下保持72小时,然后测量病斑直径。对照叶保持无症状,而接种分离株116、10091和B05.10的叶片出现了平均直径为19至20毫米的坏死病斑。从接种分离株116的叶片病斑上重新分离出的真菌形成的菌落形态与原始分离株116相同。据我们所知,这是中国首次关于拟灰葡萄孢侵染番茄的报道。其余七个分离株根据Bc-hch-RFLP基因分型被鉴定为灰葡萄孢(数据未显示),表明在中国该地区拟灰葡萄孢可能以低频率感染番茄植株。参考文献:(1)E. 富尼耶等人,《分子生态学笔记》2:253,2002年。(2)E. 富尼耶等人