• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响镇痛治疗效果的因素。俄罗斯NOTE多中心研究结果(非甾体抗炎药:开放标签疗效试验)

Factors affecting the results of analgesic therapy. Results of the Russian multicentre study of NOTE (NSAID: Open-label Trial of Efficacy).

作者信息

Karateev A E, Pogozheva E Yu, Filatova E A, Amirjanova V N, Lila A M, Antipova O V, Babaeva A R, Volkorezova A V, Davydova A F, Davtyan V G, Zonova E V, Ivanova O N, Kalinina N N, Kiseleva N I, Knyazeva L A, Kulikov A I, Nesmeyanova O B, Mazurov V I, Masneva L V, Menshikova L V, Obuhova I V, Otteva E N, Salnikova T S, Shсhendrygin I N, Yakupova S P

机构信息

V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia.

Autonomous Healthcare Institution "Irkutsk Clinical Hospital №1", Irkutsk, Russia.

出版信息

Ter Arkh. 2018 Jun 20;90(6):65-73. doi: 10.26442/terarkh201890665-73.

DOI:10.26442/terarkh201890665-73
PMID:30701907
Abstract

AIM

To identify factors affecting the effectiveness of NSAIDs in patients with OA and LBP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2-week course of NSAIDs in OA and LBP in real clinical practice. The study group consisted of 3604 patients with OA and LBP (60.6% women and 39.4% men, mean age 55.0±13.4 years). According to the study design, aceclofenac (Airtal) and other NSAIDs used in the ratio 1:1. The main criterion of effectiveness was the frequency of complete pain relief after 2 weeks of therapy. In addition, the decrease of pain and general health were determined on a 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS). We compared the frequency of complete pain relief in patients who had and did not have the studied factors. The value of the studied factors was determined using OR (95% CI).

RESULTS

Most patients received aceclofenac (54.9%), as well as diclofenac (2.0%), ketoprofen (1.9%), lornoxicam (2.2%), meloxicam (13.7%), naproxen (2.1%), nimesulide (5.8%), celecoxib (5.9%), ethicoxib (7.1%) and other NSAIDs (4.4%); 56.2% of patients received muscle relaxants, mainly tolperisone (74.7%), vitamin B (10.4%), and proton pump inhibitors (42.8%). Complete pain relief was achieved in 54.8% of patients. The pain decrease and general health improvement were (for NRS) 63.9±13.4% and 61.7±14.8%, respectively. The efficacy of aceclofenac was slightly higher than in the whole group: complete pain relief was in 59.9% of patients. Adverse events in aceclofenac use were observed in 2.3% of patients, other NSAIDs-from 2.4 to 14.1%. The frequency of complete pain relief was higher in men: OR 1,239 (95% CI 1.08-1.418; p=0.002), who had the first episode of pain - OR 3.341 (95% CI 2.873-3.875; p=0.000), a good" response " to NSAIDs in history - OR 1.656 (95% CI 1.385-1.980; p=0.000) and received NSAIDs in combination with muscle relaxants - OR 1.218 (95% CI 1.067-1.390; p=0.004). The effect of therapy is lower in patients 65 years and older-OR 0,378 (95% CI 0.324-0.442; p=0,000), with body mass index >30 kg/m² - OR 0.619 (95% CI 0.529-0.723; p=0.000), with severe pain (≥7 points NRS) - OR 0.662 (95% CI 0.580-0.756; p=0.002), with pain at rest, - OR 0.515 (95% CI 0.450-0,589; p=0.000), pain at night - OR 0.581 (95% CI 0.501-0.672; p=0.000) and the presence of stiffness - OR 0.501 (95% CI 0.438-0,573; p=0.000). Treatment results are significantly worse in the cases of combination of LBP and joint pain, as well as pain in the trochanter major and pes anserinus area (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

NSAIDs are the first-line medications for the pain treatment in LBP and OA. Aceclofenac is effective and safe in this conditions. When carrying out analgesic therapy should take into account factors that affect the effectiveness of treatment: old age, overweight, insufficient effect of NSAIDs in history, severe pain, signs of "inflammatory" pain, multiple sources of pain.

摘要

目的

确定影响非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)对骨关节炎(OA)和腰椎间盘疼痛(LBP)患者疗效的因素。

材料与方法

进行一项观察性研究,以评估在实际临床实践中,为期2周的NSAIDs疗程对OA和LBP的疗效。研究组由3604例OA和LBP患者组成(女性占60.6%,男性占39.4%,平均年龄55.0±13.4岁)。根据研究设计,醋氯芬酸(艾瑞昔布)与其他NSAIDs的使用比例为1:1。疗效的主要标准是治疗2周后完全缓解疼痛的频率。此外,采用10分数字评定量表(NRS)确定疼痛减轻程度和总体健康状况。我们比较了存在和不存在所研究因素的患者中完全缓解疼痛的频率。所研究因素的值通过比值比(OR)(95%置信区间)确定。

结果

大多数患者使用醋氯芬酸(54.9%),以及双氯芬酸(2.0%)、酮洛芬(1.9%)、氯诺昔康(2.2%)、美洛昔康(13.7%)、萘普生(2.1%)、尼美舒利(5.8%)、塞来昔布(5.9%)、依托昔布(7.1%)和其他NSAIDs(4.4%);56.2%的患者使用肌肉松弛剂,主要是甲苯哌丙酮(74.7%)、维生素B(10.4%)和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)(42.8%)。54.8%的患者实现了完全缓解疼痛。疼痛减轻程度和总体健康状况改善程度(NRS评分)分别为63.9±13.4%和61.7±14.8%。醋氯芬酸的疗效略高于整个研究组:59. % 的患者实现了完全缓解疼痛。使用醋氯芬酸的患者中2.3%发生了不良事件,其他NSAIDs为2.4%至14.1%。男性完全缓解疼痛的频率更高:比值比为1.239(95%置信区间1.08 - 1.418;p = 0.002),首次出现疼痛的患者比值比为3.341(95%置信区间2.873 - 3.875;p = 0.000),既往对NSAIDs有“良好”反应的患者比值比为1.656(95%置信区间1.385 - 1.980;p = 0.000),同时使用NSAIDs和肌肉松弛剂的患者比值比为1.218(95%置信区间1.067 - 1.390;p = 0.0)。65岁及以上患者的治疗效果较低,比值比为0.378(95%置信区间0.324 - 0.442;p = 0.000),体重指数>30kg/m²的患者比值比为0.619(95%置信区间0.529 - 0.723;p = 0.000),疼痛严重(NRS评分≥7分)的患者比值比为0.662(95%置信区间0.580 - 0.756;p = 0.002),静息痛患者比值比为0.515(95%置信区间0.450 - 0.589;p = 0.000),夜间痛患者比值比为0.581(95%置信区间0.501 - 0.672;p = 0.000),存在僵硬症状的患者比值比为0.501(95%置信区间0.438 - 0.573;p = 0.000)。在LBP合并关节痛以及大转子和鹅足区域疼痛的情况下,治疗效果明显更差(p<0.001)。

结论

NSAIDs是LBP和OA疼痛治疗的一线药物。在这种情况下,醋氯芬酸有效且安全。进行镇痛治疗时应考虑影响治疗效果的因素:老年、超重、既往NSAIDs效果不佳、严重疼痛、“炎性”疼痛体征、多源性疼痛。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting the results of analgesic therapy. Results of the Russian multicentre study of NOTE (NSAID: Open-label Trial of Efficacy).影响镇痛治疗效果的因素。俄罗斯NOTE多中心研究结果(非甾体抗炎药:开放标签疗效试验)
Ter Arkh. 2018 Jun 20;90(6):65-73. doi: 10.26442/terarkh201890665-73.
2
[Therapy for acute/subacute musculoskeletal pain: results of the ATUSA (Analgesic Treatment Using a Systemic Algorithm) observational study].[急性/亚急性肌肉骨骼疼痛的治疗:ATUSA(使用系统算法的镇痛治疗)观察性研究结果]
Ter Arkh. 2017;89(12. Vyp. 2):175-184. doi: 10.17116/terarkh20178912175-184.
3
Analgesic effectiveness of celecoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip requiring joint replacement surgery: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, double-dummy, noninferiority study.塞来昔布与双氯芬酸对需行关节置换手术的髋骨关节炎患者的镇痛效果:一项为期12周的多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、双模拟、非劣效性研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Jan;30(1):70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.016.
4
Aceclofenac: a reappraisal of its use in the management of pain and rheumatic disease.醋氯芬酸:对其在疼痛和风湿性疾病管理中应用的重新评估
Drugs. 2001;61(9):1351-78. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161090-00012.
5
[The efficacy of meloxicam in acute back pain: results of an observational non-interventional multicenter study].美洛昔康治疗急性背痛的疗效:一项观察性非干预性多中心研究的结果
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(6):24-30. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20181186124.
6
The efficacy of tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets (Ultracet®) as add-on and maintenance therapy in knee osteoarthritis pain inadequately controlled by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚复方片剂(优泰太®)作为 NSAID 未能充分控制的膝骨关节炎疼痛的附加治疗和维持治疗的疗效。
Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;31(2):317-23. doi: 10.1007/s10067-011-1818-y. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
7
8
A comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of diclofenac in osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.双氯芬酸治疗骨关节炎疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):163-78. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.649848.
9
Comparison of gastrointestinal safety and tolerability of aceclofenac with diclofenac: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in patients with knee osteoarthritis.比较醋氯芬酸与双氯芬酸的胃肠道安全性和耐受性:膝骨关节炎患者的多中心、随机、双盲研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Jul;29(7):849-59. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.795139. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
10
Efficacy and safety of aceclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind comparative clinical trial versus diclofenac - an Indian experience.醋氯芬酸治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:与双氯芬酸对比的随机双盲对照临床试验——一项印度的研究经验
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 May;22(5):977-88. doi: 10.1185/030079906X104722.

引用本文的文献

1
Moderators of treatment effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with (sub) acute low back pain: Protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis.非甾体抗炎药治疗(亚)急性下背痛患者疗效的调节因素:一项采用个体参与者数据荟萃分析的系统评价方案
MethodsX. 2024 Apr 11;12:102713. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102713. eCollection 2024 Jun.