Suppr超能文献

监测性结肠镜检查的预约时间常常早于澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会的指南:一项单中心审计的结果

Surveillance colonoscopies frequently booked earlier than the National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines: findings of a single centre audit.

作者信息

Bunjo Zachary, Koh Yu Han, Leopardi Lisa, Reid Jessica, Maddern Guy J, Hewett Peter J

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2019 Mar;89(3):E61-E65. doi: 10.1111/ans.14934. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the adherence rate of surveillance colonoscopy booking intervals to recommended National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

METHODS

Patients on The Queen Elizabeth Hospital colorectal unit surveillance colonoscopy waiting list were included in this audit. Patient demographics, colonoscopy findings, follow-up plans and pathology results were analysed. Patients were categorized as normal/non-neoplastic finding, low-risk adenomas, high-risk adenomas, personal history of colorectal cancer (CRC) and family history of CRC. Booked colonoscopy within 2 months of guideline recommended interval was considered correct.

RESULTS

A total of 467 patients were included (59.1% male; mean age 60 years). Two hundred and fifty-one (53.7%) patients had an incorrect surveillance colonoscopy booking. Twenty-seven patients with a normal/non-neoplastic previous colonoscopy not requiring surveillance colonoscopy were incorrectly booked for a colonoscopy. For the 222 patients booked incorrectly and requiring surveillance colonoscopy, 88.7% were early and 11.3% were late. The proportions of incorrect bookings were highest in the low-risk finding (66.1%) and history of CRC (67.6%) groups. For the 186 patients requiring a 3-year surveillance interval, 38.7% were booked incorrectly. For the 197 patients requiring a 5-year surveillance interval, 63.5% were booked incorrectly, of which 99.2% were early. More 5-year surveillance interval patients were booked at 3 years (n = 79), than at the correct interval of 5 years (n = 72).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to the National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines for surveillance colonoscopy is poor. The majority of deviations represent early follow-up, which is most common among patients with low-risk findings or history of CRC. There is a tendency towards 3-year surveillance among low-risk patients.

摘要

背景

评估澳大利亚阿德莱德伊丽莎白女王医院监测结肠镜检查预约间隔对澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会推荐指南的遵循率。

方法

纳入伊丽莎白女王医院结直肠科监测结肠镜检查等待名单上的患者进行此次审计。分析患者的人口统计学资料、结肠镜检查结果、随访计划和病理结果。患者分为正常/非肿瘤性发现、低风险腺瘤、高风险腺瘤、结直肠癌(CRC)个人史和CRC家族史。在指南推荐间隔的2个月内预约结肠镜检查被视为正确。

结果

共纳入467例患者(男性占59.1%;平均年龄60岁)。251例(53.7%)患者的监测结肠镜检查预约不正确。27例之前结肠镜检查正常/非肿瘤性且无需监测结肠镜检查的患者被错误预约了结肠镜检查。在222例预约错误且需要监测结肠镜检查的患者中,88.7%为提前预约,11.3%为延迟预约。低风险发现组(66.1%)和CRC病史组(67.6%)的预约错误比例最高。对于186例需要3年监测间隔的患者,38.7%预约错误。对于197例需要5年监测间隔的患者,63.5%预约错误,其中99.2%为提前预约。需要5年监测间隔的患者中,3年预约的(n = 79)比正确间隔5年预约的(n = 72)更多。

结论

对澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会监测结肠镜检查指南的遵循情况较差。大多数偏差表现为提前随访,这在低风险发现或CRC病史的患者中最为常见。低风险患者有倾向于3年监测的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验