Harveson R M, Bolton M D
University of Nebraska, Panhandle REC, 4502 Ave I, Scottsbluff, 69361.
USDA-ARS, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, 1605 Albrecht Blvd N, Fargo, ND 58102.
Plant Dis. 2013 Nov;97(11):1508. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-13-0375-PDN.
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is the primary source of domestic sucrose in the United States. In 2011, a sugar beet field in Morrill County, NE, was noted with wilting and yellowing symptoms suggestive of Rhizoctonia root and crown rot (RRCR), an important disease of sugar beet primarily caused by Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 2-2 (4). While the foliar symptoms were consistent with RRCR, the symptoms on the root were not. Root symptoms consisted of localized, dry, sunken lesions covering brown spongy tissue penetrating deeply into taproots. The surface tissues of the cankers distinctively produced a series of concentric circles. These root symptoms are inconsistent with RRCR, but are suggestive of a rarely occurring disease known as dry rot canker (DRC). DRC was first identified from Utah in 1921 (1), and assumed at the time to be caused by an uncharacterized strain of R. solani. It has since been sporadically but empirically noted from most western sugar beet growing states (4), but little is known about the pathogen or disease due to its infrequent appearances. To investigate the etiology of this disease, necrotic lesion borders were excised from diseased taproots, surface disinfested in 1% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 90 s, rinsed with distilled water for 90 s, and after drying on sterile tissue paper, placed on half-strength potato dextrose agar (½PDA) and incubated at 25 to 27°C. After 24 to 36 h, Rhizoctonia-like fungal growth was readily observed emerging from tissue pieces. Resulting colonies were tan to light brown. The ITS region of the rDNA was amplified from 4 isolates obtained from 4 distinct lesions and roots using the ITS1 and ITS4 primers (3) with standard PCR conditions, and sequenced (GenBank KC842197 to KC842200). The ITS regions were 100% identical between the 4 isolates and 96% (E-value = 0.0) identical to binucleate Rhizoctonia and Ceratobasidium sp. AG-F (e.g., JF519832, FR734295, JF705217). Hyphal cells were observed to be binucleate after staining 48-h-old cultures with lactophenol blue. Therefore, these isolates were identified to be a binucleate Rhizoctonia group AG-F based on morphological and molecular characteristics. Although distinct from DRC, a similar phenomenon has been recently reported from China implicating binucleate Rhizoctonia species with seedling disease in sugar beets (2). To determine pathogenicity of DRC isolates, 1- and 2-month-old sugar beet plants grown in 10 cm pots (5 plants per pot with 4 replications per isolate) were inoculated with all 4 isolates by placing 3 mycelial plugs (8 mm diameter) taken from the leading edge of ½PDA plates onto the soil surface of each pot. PDA plugs were utilized as controls. After ~3 weeks, root lesions resembling DRC were observed and isolates were recovered and identified from diseased plants as described above. No symptoms developed on control plants. To our knowledge, this is the first formally confirmed report of DRC on sugar beets in more than 75 years from the Western Hemisphere. The original investigator suspected that the isolates he found inducing this disease were different from typical R. solani isolates based on different symptoms (1). Our results, based on different symptoms but also with distinct molecular, biological, and pathogenicity traits, validate those suspicions while also fulfilling Koch's postulates with binucleate Rhizoctonia AG-F pathogenic to sugar beet that is distinct from the more common R. solani. References: (1) B. L. Richards. J. Agric. Res. 22:47, 1921. (2) P. P. Wang and X. H. Wu. Plant Dis. 96:1696, 2012.(3) T. J. White et al. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 1990. (4) C. E. Windels et al. Rhizoctonia Root and Crown Rot. Page 33 in: Compendium of Beet Diseases and Pests. R. M. Harveson et al., eds. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, 2009.
甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.)是美国国内蔗糖的主要来源。2011年,美国内布拉斯加州莫里尔县的一块甜菜田出现了萎蔫和黄化症状,疑似丝核菌根腐和冠腐病(RRCR),这是一种主要由立枯丝核菌融合群2-2引起的甜菜重要病害(4)。虽然叶片症状与RRCR一致,但根部症状却并非如此。根部症状表现为局部的、干燥的、凹陷的病斑,覆盖着棕色海绵状组织,并深入主根。溃疡表面组织明显形成了一系列同心圆。这些根部症状与RRCR不符,但提示了一种罕见的病害,称为干腐溃疡病(DRC)。DRC于1921年首次在犹他州被发现(1),当时认为是由一种未鉴定的立枯丝核菌菌株引起的。此后,在大多数西部甜菜种植州都有零星但经验性的记录(4),但由于其出现频率低,对该病原菌或病害了解甚少。为了调查这种病害的病因,从患病主根上切下坏死病斑边缘,在1%(v/v)次氯酸钠中表面消毒90秒,用蒸馏水冲洗90秒,在无菌纸巾上干燥后,置于半强度马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂(½PDA)上,在25至27°C下培养。24至36小时后,很容易观察到从组织块中长出类似丝核菌的真菌生长。产生的菌落为棕褐色至浅褐色。使用ITS1和ITS4引物(3),在标准PCR条件下,从4个不同病斑和根部获得的4个分离物中扩增rDNA的ITS区域,并进行测序(GenBank KC842197至KC842200)。这4个分离物的ITS区域完全相同,与双核丝核菌和角担菌属AG-F的相似度为96%(E值 = 0.0)(例如,JF519832、FR734295、JF705217)。用乳酚蓝对48小时龄的培养物染色后,观察到菌丝细胞为双核。因此,根据形态和分子特征,这些分离物被鉴定为双核丝核菌AG-F组。虽然与DRC不同,但最近中国也报道了类似现象,涉及双核丝核菌物种与甜菜幼苗病害有关(2)。为了确定DRC分离物的致病性,将1个月和2个月大的甜菜植株种植在10厘米的花盆中(每盆5株,每个分离物4次重复),通过将从½PDA平板前沿取下(直径8毫米)的3个菌丝块放置在每个花盆的土壤表面,用所有4个分离物对其进行接种。使用PDA块作为对照。约3周后,观察到根部出现类似DRC的病斑,从患病植株中回收并鉴定分离物,方法如上所述。对照植株未出现症状。据我们所知,这是西半球75多年来关于甜菜干腐溃疡病的第一份正式确认报告。最初的研究者怀疑,他发现的诱导这种病害的分离物与典型的立枯丝核菌分离物不同,基于不同的症状(1)。我们的结果基于不同的症状,同时也具有独特的分子、生物学和致病性特征,可以证实这些怀疑,同时也通过对甜菜致病的双核丝核菌AG-F满足了科赫法则,该菌与更常见的立枯丝核菌不同。参考文献:(1)B. L. Richards。《农业研究杂志》22:47,1921年。(2)P. P. Wang和X. H. Wu。《植物病害》96:1696,2012年。(3)T. J. White等人。学术出版社,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥。1990年。(4)C. E. Windels等人。丝核菌根腐和冠腐病。载于《甜菜病虫害汇编》第33页。R. M. Harveson等人编。美国植物病理学会出版社,明尼苏达州圣保罗,2009年。