Eye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Eye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Mar;45(3):337-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.037. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Comparison of lens capsule-related complications resulting from femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy and manual capsulorhexis in patients with white cataracts.
Eye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Medical School, Hangzhou, China.
Prospective consecutive nonrandomized comparative cohort study.
Selected patients were divided into a femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery group (FLACS group) and a conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery group (CPCS group). Each case was recorded as either a type I or type II white cataract. Here, type I was characterized by the presence of a liquefied cortex, whereas type II had a solid cortex. Five experienced phacoemulsification surgeons conducted all surgeries. Lens capsule-related events, including anterior capsule tears, posterior capsule ruptures (PCRs), incomplete capsulotomies, and irregular capsulorhexes were recorded; surgical parameters, postoperative visual acuities, and intraocular lens (IOL) decentrations were evaluated.
The study comprised 132 eyes of 132 patients (66 in each group). Anterior capsule tears were significantly more common in the CPCS group than the FLACS group (12.1% versus 0%). All 8 cases of anterior capsule tears were type I cases. Six FLACS cases developed incomplete capsulotomies, four of which were type I cases. The incidences of PCRs and vitreous loss were the same. Capsulotomy produced better circularity index and diameter stability than capsulorhexis. IOLs were better centered in the FLACS group than the CPCS group. The mean ultrasound power, absolute phaco time, effective phaco time, and postoperative visual acuities were similar in both groups.
Compared with CPCS, FLACS decreased the risk for anterior capsule tears in white cataracts, especially in type I cases. However, it did not reduce the incidence of PCR. Incomplete capsulotomy during FLACS could happen in white cataracts. Using FLACS on white cataracts enabled more precise capsulotomies and better-centered IOLs.
比较飞秒激光辅助撕囊与手动撕囊治疗白内障晶状体囊相关并发症。
浙江医科大学第二附属医院眼科中心,中国杭州。
前瞻性连续非随机对照队列研究。
选择的患者分为飞秒激光辅助白内障手术组(FLACS 组)和常规超声乳化白内障手术组(CPCS 组)。每例均记录为 I 型或 II 型白内障。I 型白内障的特征是存在液化皮质,而 II 型白内障则为固缩皮质。由 5 名经验丰富的超声乳化白内障手术医生进行所有手术。记录晶状体囊相关事件,包括前囊撕裂、后囊破裂(PCR)、不完全撕囊和不规则撕囊;评估手术参数、术后视力和人工晶状体(IOL)偏心度。
本研究共纳入 132 例 132 只眼(每组 66 只眼)。CPCS 组前囊撕裂的发生率明显高于 FLACS 组(12.1%比 0%)。所有 8 例前囊撕裂均为 I 型病例。FLACS 组有 6 例发生不完全撕囊,其中 4 例为 I 型病例。PCR 和玻璃体丢失的发生率相同。撕囊产生的环行指数和直径稳定性优于撕囊。FLACS 组的 IOL 更居中。两组的平均超声功率、绝对超声时间、有效超声时间和术后视力相似。
与 CPCS 相比,FLACS 降低了白内障患者前囊撕裂的风险,尤其是 I 型病例。然而,它并没有降低 PCR 的发生率。FLACS 治疗白内障时可能会发生不完全撕囊。在白内障患者中使用 FLACS 可以进行更精确的撕囊和更居中的 IOL。