• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病状态和血糖控制与急性心肌梗死后二级预防药物依从性的关系。

Association of Diabetes Mellitus Status and Glycemic Control With Secondary Prevention Medication Adherence After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

1 Department of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO.

4 Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System Denver CO.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 5;8(3):e011448. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011448.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.011448
PMID:30712488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6405589/
Abstract

Background Cardioprotective medication adherence can mitigate the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality after acute myocardial infarction ( AMI ). We examined the associations of diabetes mellitus status and glycemic control with cardioprotective medication adherence after AMI . Methods and Results We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of 14 517 US veterans who were hospitalized for their first AMI between 2011 and 2014 and prescribed a beta-blocker, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA-reductase inhibitor, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. The primary exposure was a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus; in diabetes mellitus patients, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was a secondary exposure. The primary outcome was 1-year adherence to all 3 medication classes, defined as proportion of days covered ≥0.8, assessed using adjusted risk differences and multivariable Poisson regression. Of 14 517 patients (mean age, 66.3 years; 98% male), 52% had diabetes mellitus; 9%, 31%, 24%, 15%, and 21% had HbA1c <6%, 6% to 6.9%, 7% to 7.9%, 8% to 8.9%, and ≥9%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus patients were more likely to be adherent to all 3 drug classes than those without diabetes mellitus (adjusted difference in adherence, 2.1% [0.5, 3.7]). Relative to those with HbA1c 6% to 6.9%, medication adherence declined with increasing HbA1c (risk ratio of achieving proportion of days covered ≥0.8, 0.99 [0.94, 1.04], 0.93 [0.87, 0.99], 0.82 [0.77, 0.88] for HbA1c 7-7.9%, 8-8.9%, and ≥9%, respectively). Conclusions Although diabetes mellitus status had a minor positive impact on cardioprotective medication adherence after AMI , glycemic control at the time of AMI may help identify diabetes mellitus patients at risk of medication nonadherence who may benefit from adherence interventions after AMI .

摘要

背景

心脏保护药物的依从性可以降低急性心肌梗死(AMI)后复发性心血管事件和死亡的风险。我们研究了糖尿病状态和血糖控制与 AMI 后心脏保护药物依从性的关系。

方法和结果

我们对 2011 年至 2014 年间因首次 AMI 住院并开处β受体阻滞剂、3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶 A 还原酶抑制剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的 14517 名美国退伍军人进行了回顾性观察队列研究。主要暴露因素是 2 型糖尿病的诊断;在糖尿病患者中,血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)是次要暴露因素。主要结局是所有 3 种药物类别的 1 年依从性,定义为覆盖天数比例≥0.8,使用调整后的风险差异和多变量泊松回归评估。在 14517 名患者(平均年龄 66.3 岁;98%为男性)中,52%患有糖尿病;9%、31%、24%、15%和 21%的患者 HbA1c<6%、6%至 6.9%、7%至 7.9%、8%至 8.9%和≥9%。与无糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者更有可能同时服用 3 种药物(调整后依从性差异为 2.1%[0.5,3.7])。与 HbA1c 6%至 6.9%的患者相比,HbA1c 水平升高与药物依从性下降相关(达到覆盖天数比例≥0.8 的风险比,0.99[0.94,1.04]、0.93[0.87,0.99]、0.82[0.77,0.88],分别为 HbA1c 7-7.9%、8-8.9%和≥9%)。

结论

尽管糖尿病状态对 AMI 后心脏保护药物的依从性有轻微的积极影响,但 AMI 时的血糖控制可能有助于识别药物依从性差的糖尿病患者,这些患者可能受益于 AMI 后的依从性干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b1d/6405589/04e70239cb81/JAH3-8-e011448-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b1d/6405589/93980d881983/JAH3-8-e011448-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b1d/6405589/04e70239cb81/JAH3-8-e011448-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b1d/6405589/93980d881983/JAH3-8-e011448-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b1d/6405589/04e70239cb81/JAH3-8-e011448-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Diabetes Mellitus Status and Glycemic Control With Secondary Prevention Medication Adherence After Acute Myocardial Infarction.糖尿病状态和血糖控制与急性心肌梗死后二级预防药物依从性的关系。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 5;8(3):e011448. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011448.
2
Adherence to agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system in secondary prevention of non-fatal myocardial infarction: a self-controlled case-series study.在非致死性心肌梗死二级预防中,依从不依赖肾素-血管紧张素系统的药物:一项自身对照病例系列研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2015 Oct;1(4):254-9. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvv028. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Adherence Tradeoff to Multiple Preventive Therapies and All-Cause Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后多种预防性治疗的依从性权衡与全因死亡率
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 26;70(13):1543-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.783.
4
The impact of in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation program on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the Lazio region of Italy.意大利拉齐奥地区医院内心脏康复计划对急性心肌梗死患者药物治疗依从性和临床结局的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Sep 27;21(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02261-6.
5
Longitudinal persistence with secondary prevention therapies relative to patient risk after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后二级预防治疗的纵向持续性与患者风险的关系。
Heart. 2015 May 15;101(10):800-7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306754. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
6
Beyond medication prescription as performance measures: optimal secondary prevention medication dosing after acute myocardial infarction.超越药物处方的绩效衡量指标:急性心肌梗死后最佳二级预防药物剂量。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 5;62(19):1791-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.102. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
7
Initiation of and long-term adherence to secondary preventive drugs after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后二级预防药物的起始使用及长期依从性
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 May 31;16:115. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0283-6.
8
Does age modify the relationship between adherence to secondary prevention medications and mortality after acute myocardial infarction? A nested case-control study.年龄是否会改变急性心肌梗死后二级预防药物依从性与死亡率之间的关系?一项巢式病例对照研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Feb;71(2):243-50. doi: 10.1007/s00228-014-1793-8. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
9
Medication use in long-term survivors from the MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry.长期幸存者的药物使用情况来自 MONICA/KORA 心肌梗死登记处。
Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Jan;47:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
10
Adherence to ACC/AHA performance measures for myocardial infarction in six Middle-Eastern countries: association with in-hospital mortality and clinical characteristics.在六个中东国家中,对 ACC/AHA 心肌梗死绩效指标的遵守情况与住院死亡率和临床特征的关系。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 20;167(4):1406-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.066. Epub 2012 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Glycemic Control Trajectory with Short-Term Mortality in Diabetes Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk: a Joint Latent Class Modeling Study.高心血管风险糖尿病患者血糖控制轨迹与短期死亡率的关联:一项联合潜在类别建模研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2266-2273. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05848-5. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
National Trends of Hospital Performance in Acute Myocardial Infarction Care: Department of Veterans Affairs, 2011-2014.急性心肌梗死护理中医院绩效的全国趋势:退伍军人事务部,2011 - 2014年
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004282. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004282.
2
Coronary artery disease severity modifies associations between glycemic control and both mortality and myocardial infarction.冠状动脉疾病严重程度改变了血糖控制与死亡率和心肌梗死之间的关联。
J Diabetes Complications. 2018 May;32(5):480-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Antihyperglycemic Medications: A Claims-Based Estimate of First-line Therapy Use Prior to Initialization of Second-line Medications.
抗高血糖药物:基于索赔数据对二线药物初始化前一线治疗使用情况的估计
Diabetes Care. 2017 Nov;40(11):1500-1505. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0213. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
4
Hot Topics in Primary Care: Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Real-World Strategies for Addressing a Common Problem.基层医疗中的热点话题:2型糖尿病的药物依从性——解决常见问题的现实策略
J Fam Pract. 2017 Apr;66(4 Suppl):S46-S51.
5
Glycemic Control Status After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血糖控制状况及长期临床结局
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004157.
6
Is Hemoglobin A1c the Right Outcome for Studies of Diabetes?糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)是糖尿病研究的恰当结局指标吗?
JAMA. 2017 Mar 14;317(10):1017-1018. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0029.
7
THE IMPACT OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL: A REVIEW.心血管药物对血糖控制的影响:综述
Endocr Pract. 2017 Mar;23(3):363-371. doi: 10.4158/EP161309.RA. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
8
Association Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Genetic Variants and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis.低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低基因变异与2型糖尿病风险的关联:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1383-1391. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14568.
9
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
10
Trends in myocardial infarction secondary prevention: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), 1999-2012.心肌梗死二级预防的趋势:1999 - 2012年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Apr 22;4(4):e001709. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001709.