Lartey R T, Caesar-TonThat T C, Caesar A J, Sainju U M, Evans R G
USDA/ARS, Northern Plains Agricultural Laboratory, 1500 North Central Ave. Sidney, MT 59270.
Plant Dis. 2013 Jan;97(1):143. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-12-0657-PDN.
Pyrenophora teres Drechs. causes net blotch of barley, a common foliar disease in cultivation zones around the world. The disease occurs in two forms, namely a net form net blotch (NFNB) caused by P. teres f. teres and a spot form net blotch (SFNB) caused by P. teres f. maculata. As in other parts of the northern Great Plains, in the Mon-Dak area (western North Dakota and eastern Montana), NFNB is prevalent. SFNB was first reported in western Montana in 1983 (1) and more recently in eastern North Dakota in 2010 (3) but not in the Mon-Dak area. In the summer of 2011, unusual spot lesions that were surrounded by necrosis or chlorosis were observed on different barley cultivars in fields at Williston, ND, Nesson Valley, ND, and Sidney, MT areas. Diseased leaves from various barley cvs. from the three locations were transferred to water agar and incubated at room temperature for 24 h to induce sporulation. Morphological examination of conidia (45 to 169 × 15 to 21 μm) did not show significant differences from a known isolate of P. teres f. teres 0-1 (provided by Tim Friesen, ARS, Fargo, ND). For pathogenicity testing, six 14-day-old plants of barley cv. Tradition were sprayed until runoff with a 2,000 spore/ml suspension of two isolates from each location and the control P. teres f. maculata isolate DEN2.6 (provided by Tim Friesen). Plants were incubated first in a lighted humidity chamber for 24 h and then in a greenhouse for 7 days at 21°C. Regardless of inoculum source, spot lesions surrounded by necrosis or chlorosis, typical of SFNB, appeared on the inoculated leaves within 7 days. Fungi isolated from symptomatic leaves were identified as P. teres and the morphology of the conidia was undistinguishable from those of P. teres f. teres. All control plants which were sprayed with sterile distilled water were symptomless. The pathogenicity test was repeated. Rapid PCR detection and amplicon sequencing (2) of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal genes was performed on field and pathogenicity test leaf lesion samples to confirm the presence of P. teres f. maculata. DNA templates were prepared using the Extract-N-Amp Plant PCR Kits (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) and subjected to PCR using ITS1 and ITS4 primers. Amplicons were then purified and sequenced. The 585-bp nucleotide sequences of P. teres f. maculata from Mon-Dak area were submitted to GenBank under accession nos. PtmNES1 (JX187587), PtmSDY1 (JX187588), PtmSDY2 (JX187589), and PtmWIL1 (JX187590). The sequences from the four locations shared 100% similarity and also with P. teres f. maculata (EF452471) from GenBank while showing 10 nucleotide differences (99% similarity) with P. teres f. teres (EF452472).The results represent first report of SFNB in the Mon-Dak. Barley is one of the most important crops in the area. Resistance of the NFNB and SFNB of barley are controlled by different genes (4). Based on this report, SFNB therefore have to be considered in selection of barley cultivars for cultivation in the area. References: (1) H. E Bockelman et al. Plant Dis. 67:696, 1983. (2) R. T. Lartey et al. J. Sugar Beet Res. 40:1, 2003. (3) Z. H. Liu and T. L. Friesen. Plant Dis. 94:480, 2010. (4) O. M. Manninen et al. Genome. 46:1564, 2006.
网斑病菌(Pyrenophora teres Drechs.)可引发大麦网斑病,这是一种在全球种植区都较为常见的叶部病害。该病害有两种类型,即由网斑病菌圆斑专化型(P. teres f. teres)引起的网纹型网斑病(NFNB)和由网斑病菌黄斑专化型(P. teres f. maculata)引起的斑点型网斑病(SFNB)。与大平原北部的其他地区一样,在蒙大地区(北达科他州西部和蒙大拿州东部),NFNB较为普遍。SFNB于1983年首次在蒙大拿州西部被报道(1),最近在2010年于北达科他州东部也有报道(3),但在蒙大地区尚未见报道。2011年夏季,在北达科他州威利斯顿、北达科他州内森谷以及蒙大拿州锡德尼地区的田间,不同大麦品种上观察到了异常的斑点状病斑,这些病斑被坏死或褪绿组织包围。从这三个地点采集的不同大麦品种的病叶被转移至水琼脂培养基上,并在室温下培养24小时以诱导产孢。分生孢子的形态学检查(45至169×15至21μm)显示,与已知的网斑病菌圆斑专化型菌株0 - 1(由美国农业部农业研究局的蒂姆·弗里森提供,位于北达科他州法戈)并无显著差异。为进行致病性测试,对6株14日龄的大麦品种“传统”植株进行喷雾处理,直至径流,喷雾液为来自每个地点的两个分离菌株以及对照菌株网斑病菌黄斑专化型DEN2.6(由蒂姆·弗里森提供)的2000个孢子/毫升悬浮液。植株先在光照湿度箱中培养24小时,然后在21°C的温室中培养7天。无论接种源如何,接种叶片在7天内均出现了被坏死或褪绿组织包围的斑点状病斑,这是SFNB的典型症状。从有症状叶片上分离出的真菌被鉴定为网斑病菌,其分生孢子形态与网斑病菌圆斑专化型的分生孢子无法区分。所有用无菌蒸馏水喷雾处理的对照植株均无症状。致病性测试重复进行。对田间和致病性测试的叶部病斑样本进行了核糖体基因内部转录间隔区(ITS)区域的快速PCR检测和扩增子测序(2),以确认网斑病菌黄斑专化型的存在。使用Extract - N - Amp植物PCR试剂盒(Sigma化学公司,密苏里州圣路易斯)制备DNA模板,并使用ITS1和ITS4引物进行PCR。然后对扩增子进行纯化和测序。蒙大地区网斑病菌黄斑专化型的585个碱基对的核苷酸序列已提交至GenBank,登录号分别为PtmNES1(JX187587)、PtmSDY1(JX187588)、PtmSDY2(JX187589)和PtmWIL1(JX187590)。来自这四个地点的序列与GenBank中的网斑病菌黄斑专化型(EF452471)相似度为100%,而与网斑病菌圆斑专化型(EF452472)有10个核苷酸差异(相似度为99%)。这些结果代表了蒙大地区首次报道SFNB。大麦是该地区最重要的作物之一。大麦NFNB和SFNB的抗性由不同基因控制(4)。基于本报告,因此在该地区选择用于种植的大麦品种时必须考虑SFNB。参考文献:(1)H. E Bockelman等人,《植物病害》67:696,1983年。(2)R. T. Lartey等人,《甜菜研究杂志》40:1,2003年。(3)Z. H. Liu和T. L. Friesen,《植物病害》94:480,2010年。(4)O. M. Manninen等人,《基因组》46:1564,2006年。