Toth Jill, O'connor Colleen, Hartman Brenda, Dworatzek Paula, Horne Justine
a School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College, Western University, London, ON.
b Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Western University, London, ON.
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2019 Sep 1;80(3):116-121. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2018-047. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
While the title Registered Dietitian (RD) is regulated under provincial legislation in Ontario and other Canadian provinces, the title "nutritionist" is not regulated in Ontario, which poses potential risks to consumers who place misguided trust in those proclaiming to be nutrition experts. This is concerning as nutrition is a complex health care discipline and RDs, the recognized providers of credible nutrition information, must be registered with an accredited regulatory college that requires them to have undergone rigorous training, practicum placements, entrance examinations, and continuous professional development. The purpose of this study was to determine if Ontario-based unregulated nutritionists and RDs are providing safe, evidence-based, information regarding detoxification diets. Content from 10 blog posts were qualitatively analyzed using deductive content analysis with predetermined categorization matrices. The results revealed that Ontario nutritionists promoted detox diets and provided unproven, misleading, and potentially harmful information, whereas Ontario RDs did not promote detox diets and provided evidence-based, harm-reducing information. Additionally, conflicts of interest arose only in nutritionists' blog posts. RDs provided credible references for their information while nutritionists did not. Protecting the term "nutritionist" for use exclusively by RDs under provincial legislation would be a positive step towards ensuring Ontarians are receiving the highest quality evidence-based nutrition information.
虽然“注册营养师(RD)”这一称谓在安大略省和加拿大其他省份受到省级立法的监管,但“营养师”这一称谓在安大略省并未受到监管,这给那些盲目信任自称营养专家的消费者带来了潜在风险。这令人担忧,因为营养是一门复杂的医疗保健学科,而注册营养师作为可信营养信息的公认提供者,必须在认可的监管学院注册,该学院要求他们接受严格的培训、实习、入学考试以及持续的专业发展。本研究的目的是确定安大略省未经监管的营养师和注册营养师是否提供有关排毒饮食的安全、循证信息。使用带有预定分类矩阵的演绎性内容分析法对10篇博客文章的内容进行了定性分析。结果显示,安大略省的营养师推广排毒饮食,并提供未经证实、具有误导性且可能有害的信息,而安大略省的注册营养师不推广排毒饮食,并提供循证的、减少危害的信息。此外,利益冲突仅出现在营养师的博客文章中。注册营养师为其信息提供了可靠的参考,而营养师则没有。根据省级立法,将“营养师”这一称谓仅保留给注册营养师使用,将是朝着确保安大略省居民获得最高质量的循证营养信息迈出的积极一步。