Delgado J A, Goswami R S, Harveson R M, Urrea C A, Beran D, Markell S G
Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58102.
Panhandle Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Scotts Bluff, NE, 69361.
Plant Dis. 2012 Jul;96(7):1073. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0961-PDN.
Ascochyta blight, caused by Ascochyta rabiei, is a serious disease of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and fungicide applications are used to manage the disease in the North Central plains (4). During the 2010 growing season, a commercial field near Stanley, SD was treated with pyraclostrobin (Headline, BASF, NC) and called a management failure by the grower. Similarly, limited efficacy of pyraclostrobin was observed in an ascochyta research trial near Scott's Bluff, NE. In both locations, symptoms and signs consistent with A. rabiei infection existed on leaves, stems, and pods; namely, circular brown lesions with concentric rings of dark brown pycnidia. Symptomatic samples were collected, disinfected with 95% ethanol for 1 min, rinsed with sterile water, placed in 0.5% NaOCl for 1 min, and rinsed again with sterile water for 1 min (4). Samples were air dried, placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates for 3 to 7 days, and colonies with morphological characteristics typical of A. rabiei were single-spored and transferred to new PDA plates and incubated for 7 to 14 days. Three and six putative A. rabiei isolates were obtained from South Dakota and Nebraska samples, respectively. Morphological characteristics were consistent with A. rabiei; cultures were brown with concentric rings of dark, pear-shaped pycnidia with an ostiole, and conidia were hyaline, single-celled, and oval-shaped (2). Comparison of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region amplified from the genomic DNA of 3-day-old liquid cultures using ITS4/ITS5 primers by BLASTN searches using the nr database in GenBank (Accession Number FJ032643) also confirmed isolates to be A. rabiei. Mismatch amplification mutation assay (MAMA) PCR was used for detection of sensitive and resistant isolates to QoI fungicides (1). Confirmation of the presence of the G143A mutation was carried out by cloning an mRNA fragment of the cytochrome b gene using cDNA synthesized from total RNA of A. rabiei and CBF1/CBR2 (1,3). Total RNA was extracted from 3-day-old liquid cultures and it was used instead of genomic DNA for this PCR to avoid large intronic regions commonly present in mitochondrial genes. The G143A mutation has previously been correlated with resistance to QoI fungicides in other fungal plant pathogens (3). Also, these isolates were determined to be QoI-resistant in vitro by PDA amended with a discriminatory dose of 1 μg/ml of azoxystrobin (4). To our knowledge, this is the first report of QoIresistant A. rabiei isolates causing infections on chickpeas in South Dakota and Nebraska. QoI-resistant isolates were reported in North Dakota and Montana in 2005 and 2007, respectively (4). Of nearly 300 isolates collected from these states from 2005 and 2007, approximately 65% were determined to be QoI resistant (4). The widespread occurrence of QoIresistant isolates and reduction of fungicide performance in fields led the North Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service to actively discourage the use of QoI fungicides on chickpeas in North Dakota and Montana (4). It is likely that similar recommendations will need to be adopted in South Dakota and Nebraska for profitable chickpea production. References: (1) J. A. Delgado, 2012 Ph.D. Diss. Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University. (2) R. M. Harveson et al. 2011. Online. Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/PHP-2011-0103-01-DG. (3) Z. Ma et al. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 77:66, 2003. (4) K. A. Wise et al. Plant Dis. 93:528, 2009.
由鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌(Ascochyta rabiei)引起的褐斑病是鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum)的一种严重病害,在中北部平原地区,人们使用杀菌剂来防治该病(4)。在2010年生长季节期间,南达科他州斯坦利附近的一块商业田地用唑菌酯(Headline,巴斯夫公司,北卡罗来纳州)进行了处理,但种植者称防治失败。同样,在内布拉斯加州斯科特布拉夫附近的一项鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌研究试验中,也观察到唑菌酯的防效有限。在这两个地点,叶片、茎和豆荚上均出现了与鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌感染相符的症状和病征;即带有深褐色分生孢子器同心环的圆形褐色病斑。采集有症状的样本后,先用95%乙醇消毒1分钟,再用无菌水冲洗;然后置于0.5%次氯酸钠溶液中1分钟,接着再次用无菌水冲洗1分钟(4)。样本晾干后置于马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂(PDA)平板上3至7天,将具有鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌典型形态特征菌落进行单孢分离,并转接至新的PDA平板上,再培养7至14天。分别从南达科他州和内布拉斯加州的样本中获得了3株和6株疑似鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌分离株。其形态特征与鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌相符;培养物呈褐色,带有深色、梨形且有孔口的分生孢子器同心环,分生孢子透明、单细胞且呈椭圆形(2)。使用ITS4/ITS5引物从3日龄液体培养物的基因组DNA中扩增出内部转录间隔区(ITS)区域,通过在GenBank中的nr数据库(登录号FJ032643)进行BLASTN搜索,也证实分离株为鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌。错配扩增突变分析(MAMA)PCR用于检测对QoI类杀菌剂敏感和抗性的分离株(1)。通过使用从鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌和CBF1/CBR2的总RNA合成的cDNA克隆细胞色素b基因的mRNA片段,来确认G143A突变的存在(1,3)。从3日龄液体培养物中提取总RNA,并将其用于该PCR反应以替代基因组DNA,以避免线粒体基因中常见的大内含子区域。此前已发现G143A突变与其他真菌植物病原菌对QoI类杀菌剂的抗性相关(3)。此外,通过在PDA培养基中添加1 μg/ml的嘧菌酯鉴别剂量,在体外确定这些分离株对QoI类杀菌剂具有抗性(4)。据我们所知,这是南达科他州和内布拉斯加州首次报道鹰嘴豆壳二孢菌的QoI抗性分离株导致鹰嘴豆感染。2005年和2007年分别在北达科他州和蒙大拿州报道了QoI抗性分离株(4)。在2005年至2007年从这些州收集的近300株分离株中,约65%被确定为对QoI类杀菌剂具有抗性(4)。QoI抗性分离株的广泛出现以及田间杀菌剂防效的降低,导致北达科他州立大学合作推广服务中心积极劝阻在北达科他州和蒙大拿州的鹰嘴豆上使用QoI类杀菌剂(4)。南达科他州和内布拉斯加州可能也需要采取类似建议,以实现鹰嘴豆的盈利生产。参考文献:(1)J. A. Delgado,2012年博士论文,北达科他州立大学植物病理学系。(2)R. M. Harveson等人,2011年,在线发表于《植物健康进展》,doi:10.1094/PHP - 2011 - 0103 - 01 - DG。(3)Z. Ma等人,《农药生物化学与生理学》,77:66,2003年。(4)K. A. Wise等人,《植物病害》,93:528,2009年。