Tseng Y-W, Deng W-L, Chang C-J, Su C-C, Chen C-L, Jan F-J
Department of Plant Pathology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Griffin 30223.
Plant Dis. 2012 Apr;96(4):582. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-11-0888.
Purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea), widely grown as an ornamental and medicinal plant, is a perennial flowering plant that is native to eastern North America. In July 2011, symptoms indicative of phytoplasma disease, including floral virescence, phyllody, and witches'-broom (WB), were observed to be affecting plants in coneflower fields in Wufeng, Taichung City, Taiwan. Incidence of infected plants was estimated to be greater than 90% within a single field. Phytoplasmas previously associated with purple coneflower WB disease have all been classified as aster yellows group (16SrI) strains (GenBank Accession Nos. EU333395, AY394856, EU416172, and EF546778) except for pale purple coneflower (Echinacea pallida) WB in Australia, which was identified as a subgroup 16SrII-D member (2). Three diseased plants were uprooted and transplanted in a greenhouse for further study. Transmission electron microscopy revealed clusters of phytoplasma cells ranging from 170 to 490 nm in diameter in phloem sieve elements of virescent and phylloid flowers and stems from diseased plants. Comparable tissues from symptomless plants were devoid of phytoplasma. Total DNA was extracted from plant tissue samples (50 to 100 mg each) including stems, leaves, and flowers by a modified CTAB method (1) from three symptomatic plants as well as from three asymptomatic coneflower plants seedlings. Analyses by a nested PCR using universal primer pairs P1/P7 followed by R16F2n/R16R2 were performed to detect putative phytoplasma (2). Each primer pair amplified a single PCR product of either 1.8 or 1.2 kb, respectively, from diseased plant tissues only. The nested PCR products (1.2 kb) amplified from phylloid flowers of the three diseased plants were cloned separately and sequenced (GenBank Accession Nos. JN885460, JN885461, and JN885462). Blast analysis of the sequences revealed a 99.7 to 99.8% sequence identity with those of Echinacea WB phytoplasma strain EWB5 and EWB6 (GenBank Accession Nos. JF340076 and JF340080), which reportedly belonged to the 16SrII-D subgroup (2). Moreover, iPhyClassifier software (3) was used to perform sequence comparison and generate the virtual restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) profile. The 16S rDNA sequences share a 99.4 to 99.5% similarity with that of the 'Candidatus Phytoplasma australasiae' reference strain (Y10097) and the RFLP patterns are identical to that of the 16SrII-A subgroup. Taken together, these results indicated that the phytoplasma infecting purple coneflower in Taiwan is a 'Ca. Phytoplasma australasiae'-related strain and belongs to the 16SrII-A subgroup. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a 16SrII-A subgroup phytoplasma causing WB disease on purple coneflower in Taiwan. The occurrence of phytoplasma on purple coneflower could have direct implication for the economically important ornamental, medicinal plant, and floral industry in Taiwan, especially to the growers and breeders that eagerly promote the purple coneflower industry. References: (1) T. M. Fulton et al. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 13:207, 1995. (2) T. L. Pearce et al. Plant Dis. 95:773, 2011. (3) Y. Zhao et al. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59:2582, 2009.
紫锥菊(紫松果菊)作为一种观赏性和药用植物被广泛种植,是一种原产于北美东部的多年生开花植物。2011年7月,在台湾台中市雾峰区的紫锥菊田中,观察到一些植物出现了类似植原体病害的症状,包括花变绿、叶变花以及扫帚状丛生枝(WB),据估计在单个田块中受感染植株的发病率超过90%。之前与紫锥菊扫帚状丛生枝病害相关的植原体均被归类为翠菊黄化组(16SrI)菌株(GenBank登录号:EU333395、AY394856、EU416172和EF546778),但澳大利亚的浅紫锥菊(苍白松果菊)扫帚状丛生枝病害被鉴定为16SrII-D亚组成员(2)。将三株患病植株连根拔起并移植到温室中作进一步研究。透射电子显微镜观察发现,在患病植株的变绿和叶状花及茎的韧皮部筛管分子中,有直径为170至490纳米的植原体细胞簇,无症状植株的类似组织中未发现植原体。采用改良的CTAB法(1)从三株有症状植株以及三株无症状紫锥菊幼苗的植物组织样本(每个样本50至100毫克)中提取总DNA,这些样本包括茎、叶和花。使用通用引物对P1/P7,随后用R16F2n/R16R2进行巢式PCR分析,以检测假定的植原体(2)。每对引物分别仅从患病植物组织中扩增出一个1.8或1.2千碱基的单一PCR产物。从三株患病植株的叶状花中扩增出的巢式PCR产物(1.2千碱基)分别进行克隆和测序(GenBank登录号:JN885460、JN885461和JN885462)。对这些序列的Blast分析显示,与紫锥菊扫帚状丛生枝植原体菌株EWB5和EWB6(GenBank登录号:JF340076和JF340080)的序列同一性为99.7%至99.8%,据报道它们属于16SrII-D亚组(2)。此外,使用iPhyClassifier软件(3)进行序列比较并生成虚拟限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)图谱。16S rDNA序列与“澳洲植原体”参考菌株(Y10097)的相似性为99.4%至99.5%,RFLP图谱与16SrII-A亚组的图谱相同。综上所述,这些结果表明,在台湾感染紫锥菊的植原体是一种与“澳洲植原体”相关的菌株,属于16SrII-A亚组。据我们所知,这是台湾首次报道16SrII-A亚组植原体引起紫锥菊扫帚状丛生枝病害。紫锥菊上植原体的出现可能对台湾具有重要经济意义的观赏、药用植物及花卉产业产生直接影响,尤其是对急切推动紫锥菊产业发展的种植者和育种者。参考文献:(1)T. M. Fulton等人,《植物分子生物学报告》13:207,1995年。(2)T. L. Pearce等人,《植物病害》95:773,2011年。(3)Y. Zhao等人,《国际系统与进化微生物学杂志》59:2582,2009年。