Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Mar 14;64(6):065017. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab050f.
The aim of the study is to determine PTV margin for inter-observer variability in the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate radiotherapy with high-dose volumetric CT (HDVCT) and conventional helical CT (CCT) for planning. Secondly to investigate the impact of geometric (PTV expansion) and dosimetric (conformity) imperfection of planning process on the PTV margin analysis. Prostate gland of ten patients were scanned with CCT and HDVCT techniques consecutively on a 320 slice volumetric CT scanner with wide field detector of 16 cm. Five radiation oncologists delineated CTV of the prostate. VMAT plans were developed with PTV margin of 4 mm and 6 mm (totaling 200 plans) and target coverage of each plan was evaluated on the target volume in agreement determined by shared voxels with three or more from 5 observers. Dosimetry on 200 VMAT plans showed that PTV margin for inter-observer variability were 6 mm and 4 mm for CCT and HDVCT techniques, respectively. It is about 3 mm smaller than our estimation from the previous study (8.8 mm and 7.3 mm) based on the inter-observer variability. This difference is mainly due to the accuracy of PTV volume expansion and limited dose conformity to guarantee target coverage. PTVs were measured 2 mm larger on average than the assigned margin. Planning iso-dose volume was found to be 2 mm larger than PTV. Regardless these limitations, enhanced image quality of HDVCT reduces PTV margin by 2 mm compared to CCT. PTV reduction of 2 mm potentially leads to 15% reduction in D30% of rectal and bladder wall maintaining the same target coverage. Inter-observer variability remains a source of systematic uncertainty. HDVCT for treatment planning demonstrated reduction of the uncertainty and the PTV margin by 2 mm. It is important to consider the over-expanded PTV volume and generous iso-dose volume after optimization in the process of radiotherapy planning in the determination of PTV margin.
本研究旨在确定容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)前列腺放射治疗中计划时使用高剂量容积 CT(HDVCT)和常规螺旋 CT(CCT)的观察者间体积变化的 PTV 边界,并研究计划过程中几何(PTV 扩张)和剂量学(适形性)不完善对 PTV 边界分析的影响。连续对 10 例患者在具有 16cm 宽探测器的 320 层容积 CT 扫描仪上进行 CCT 和 HDVCT 技术扫描。5 位放疗医师勾画前列腺CTV。采用 PTV 边界 4mm 和 6mm(共 200 个计划)生成 VMAT 计划,并通过 5 位观察者的 3 个或更多共享体素确定靶区体积来评估每个计划的靶区覆盖情况。200 个 VMAT 计划的剂量学结果显示,CCT 和 HDVCT 技术的观察者间体积变化的 PTV 边界分别为 6mm 和 4mm。与我们之前基于观察者间体积变化的研究(8.8mm 和 7.3mm)相比,这一结果小了约 3mm。这种差异主要是由于 PTV 体积扩张的准确性和保证靶区覆盖的有限剂量适形性。PTV 平均比分配的边界大 2mm。发现计划等剂量体积比 PTV 大 2mm。尽管存在这些限制,但与 CCT 相比,HDVCT 增强的图像质量可将 PTV 边界缩小 2mm。PTV 减少 2mm 可能会导致直肠和膀胱壁的 D30%减少 15%,同时保持相同的靶区覆盖。观察者间的变异性仍然是系统不确定性的一个来源。HDVCT 用于治疗计划可将不确定性和 PTV 边界缩小 2mm。在确定 PTV 边界时,在放射治疗计划过程中考虑过度扩张的 PTV 体积和慷慨的等剂量体积是很重要的。