Suppr超能文献

扶手支撑在最大运动测试中,在明显健康的非跑步机使用者中产生更高的压力产物。

Handrail support produces a higher rate pressure product in apparently healthy non-treadmill users during maximal exercise testing.

机构信息

Cardiac Investigations Unit, Logan Hospital, Meadowbrook, Australia. Menzies Health Institute, Queensland, Australia. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia. Cardiac Investigations Unit, Logan Hospital, PO Box 6031, Yatala, Queensland 4207, Australia. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

出版信息

Physiol Meas. 2019 Feb 26;40(2):02NT01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab0565.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Exercise treadmill testing (ETT) is a well-established procedure for the diagnosis, prognosis and functional assessment of patients with suspected cardiovascular disease. The use of handrail support during ETT is often discouraged as this has been demonstrated to overestimate functional capacity. It is unknown if this increase in functional capacity translates to an increase in cardiac workload. The aim of this study was to investigate if the use of handrail support during maximal ETT produces an increase in cardiac workload when compared to no handrail support.

APPROACH

Fifty-two consenting volunteers performed two maximal ETTs, one with handrail support and the other without, approximately one week apart. Participants were identified as either experienced treadmill users (treadmill use  ⩾  once per fortnight) (n  =  24) or inexperienced users (n  =  28). Cardiac workload was quantified using rate pressure product (RPP) (systolic blood pressure (SBP)  ×  heart rate (HR)) Main results: The average age of participants was 38.4  ±  11.4 years (44% male). Overall exercise duration was significantly prolonged by 44.4% with handrail support (with support 15:01  ±  2:54 min; without support 10:24  ±  2:09 min). Overall HR, SBP and maximum RPP were not significantly different between conditions. For the 28 inexperienced treadmill users maximum RPP was significantly higher during handrail support (7.5% increase) (with support 34 417  ±  4906; without support 31 821  ±  4565).

SIGNIFICANCE

Handrail support overestimates functional capacity, however produces greater maximal RPP in inexperienced treadmill users. If accurate aerobic data is required during ETT, or subjects performing ETT are experienced treadmill users, handrail support should be discouraged. Non-treadmill users or subjects fearful of falling may benefit from handrail support, particularly when maximal cardiac workload is desired.

摘要

目的

运动平板测试(ETT)是一种用于诊断、预后和评估疑似心血管疾病患者的功能的成熟方法。在 ETT 期间使用扶手支撑通常是不受鼓励的,因为这已经被证明会高估功能能力。尚不清楚这种功能能力的增加是否会转化为心脏工作量的增加。本研究的目的是调查在最大 ETT 期间使用扶手支撑是否会比不使用扶手支撑时增加心脏工作量。

方法

52 名同意的志愿者进行了两次最大 ETT,一次有扶手支撑,另一次没有扶手支撑,大约相隔一周。参与者被确定为经验丰富的跑步机使用者(跑步机使用频率为每两周一次或以上)(n=24)或无经验的跑步机使用者(n=28)。使用心率乘积(RPP)(收缩压(SBP)×心率(HR))来量化心脏工作量。

主要结果

参与者的平均年龄为 38.4±11.4 岁(44%为男性)。使用扶手支撑时,整体运动时间平均延长了 44.4%(有支撑时为 15:01±2:54 分钟;无支撑时为 10:24±2:09 分钟)。两种情况下的整体 HR、SBP 和最大 RPP 没有显著差异。对于 28 名无经验的跑步机使用者,在使用扶手支撑时最大 RPP 显著增加(增加 7.5%)(有支撑时为 34417±4906;无支撑时为 31821±4565)。

意义

扶手支撑高估了功能能力,但在无经验的跑步机使用者中产生了更大的最大 RPP。如果在 ETT 期间需要准确的有氧运动数据,或者进行 ETT 的受试者是经验丰富的跑步机使用者,则应不鼓励使用扶手支撑。非跑步机使用者或害怕跌倒的人可能会受益于扶手支撑,特别是在需要最大心脏工作量时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验