Department of Plastic Surgery, Choonhae Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;43(2):313-327. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1217-8. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Major surgical concerns associated with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) are partial or total nipple-areola complex (NAC) loss, decreased sensation, and nipple malposition. Patient satisfaction and NAC outcomes including malposition in patients who have undergone unilateral expander-implant reconstruction after NSM as compared with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and NAC outcomes of breast cancer patients who underwent spared or reconstructed NAC after unilateral NSM as compared with unilateral SSM.
Patients who underwent immediate expander-implant breast reconstruction following unilateral NSM or SSM were included. Medical records of patients from April 2010 to February 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Reconstruction-related complications such as infection, seroma, haematoma, delayed wound healing, and reconstruction failure were recorded. NAC outcome analysis was performed using preoperative and postoperative digital photographs for each patient. Patient satisfaction with the reconstructed breast and NAC was assessed using a study-specific questionnaire.
Delayed wound healing occurred in 18 of 55 NSM patients and 15 of 85 SSM patients (p = 0.040). Final reconstruction failure occurred in 0 NSM patients and 6 SSM patients (p = 0.043). The mean photography analysis score of total aesthetic outcome was 13.12 ± 2.39 in the NSM group and 14.06 ± 2.75 in the SSM group (p = 0.052). The mean questionnaire score of NAC position was 2.88 ± 0.85 in the NSM group and 3.80 ± 0.84 in the SSM group (p = 0.001). The mean questionnaire score of NAC sensitivity was 2.12 ± 0.58 in the NSM group and 1.84 ± 0.46 in the SSM group (p = 0.003). Satisfaction with the reconstructed breast was similar (p = 0.913) after NSM and SSM.
We observed no significant difference in breast reconstruction satisfaction between the NSM and SSM groups. Although overall satisfaction with breast reconstruction is high, patients in the NSM group often report dissatisfaction with nipple position. With a favourable score for NAC position, skin-sparing mastectomy followed by NAC reconstruction can be considered as a balanced alternative to NSM for properly selected patients with breast cancer.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
保留乳头的乳房切除术(NSM)相关的主要手术问题是部分或全部乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)丢失、感觉减退和乳头位置不正。患者满意度和 NAC 结果(包括接受 NSM 后单侧扩张器-植入物重建的患者的 NAC 位置不正),与皮肤保留乳房切除术(SSM)相比,仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在评估接受单侧 NSM 后保留或重建 NAC 的乳腺癌患者的患者满意度和 NAC 结果,与单侧 SSM 相比。
纳入了 2010 年 4 月至 2014 年 2 月期间接受单侧 NSM 或 SSM 即刻扩张器-植入物乳房重建的患者。回顾性分析了患者的病历。记录了与重建相关的并发症,如感染、血清肿、血肿、伤口愈合延迟和重建失败。对每位患者的术前和术后数字照片进行了 NAC 结果分析。使用专门的问卷调查评估患者对重建乳房和 NAC 的满意度。
55 例 NSM 患者中有 18 例(32.7%)和 85 例 SSM 患者中有 15 例(17.6%)出现伤口愈合延迟(p=0.040)。0 例 NSM 患者和 6 例 SSM 患者最终重建失败(p=0.043)。NSM 组的总美学结果摄影分析评分平均值为 13.12±2.39,SSM 组为 14.06±2.75(p=0.052)。NSM 组的 NAC 位置问卷评分平均值为 2.88±0.85,SSM 组为 3.80±0.84(p=0.001)。NSM 组的 NAC 敏感性问卷评分平均值为 2.12±0.58,SSM 组为 1.84±0.46(p=0.003)。NSM 和 SSM 后对重建乳房的满意度相似(p=0.913)。
我们没有观察到 NSM 和 SSM 组之间在乳房重建满意度上有显著差异。尽管对乳房重建的总体满意度较高,但 NSM 组的患者通常对乳头位置不满意。NAC 位置的评分良好,对于选择合适的乳腺癌患者,皮肤保留乳房切除术(SSM)联合 NAC 重建可作为 NSM 的一种平衡替代方案。
证据水平 III:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。