Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California.
NorthShore University HealthSystem, Skokie, Illinois.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jun;21(6):1399-1408. doi: 10.1111/dom.13666. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) as add-on to sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor therapy.
In this 26-week, phase IIIb, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial, conducted at 74 sites in 11 countries, insulin-naïve people aged ≥18 years with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 53-97 mmol/mol (7.0-11.0%), body mass index 20-40 kg/m and inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on SGLT2 inhibitor ± oral antidiabetic drugs were randomized 1:1 to once-daily IDegLira or IGlar U100, both as add-on to existing therapy. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26.
A total of 210 participants were randomized to each treatment arm. Mean HbA1c reductions were 21 mmol/mol (1.9%-points) with IDegLira and 18 mmol/mol (1.7%-points) with IGlar U100; confirming non-inferiority (P < 0.0001) and superiority of IDegLira (difference in HbA1c change -3.90 mmol/mol; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.45; -2.35 (-0.36%-points; 95% CI -0.50, -0.21)). Superiority for IDegLira over IGlar U100 was also confirmed for: body weight (difference -1.92 kg; 95% CI -2.64, -1.19); severe or blood-glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia (rate ratio 0.42; 95% CI 0.23, 0.75); total daily insulin dose (difference -15.37 U; 95% CI -19.60, -11.13). The overall treatment-emergent adverse event rate was higher with IDegLira as a result of higher increased lipase and nausea rates.
The favourable safety and efficacy profile of IDegLira in people with uncontrolled T2D on SGLT2 inhibitors, and lower weight gain and hypoglycaemia risk versus IGlar U100, suggest that clinicians should consider IDegLira initiation in this population.
评估德谷胰岛素/利拉鲁肽(IDegLira)与甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升(IGlar U100)作为钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂治疗的附加疗法的疗效和安全性。
这是一项为期 26 周的 IIIb 期、开放标签、平行组、以目标为导向的试验,在 11 个国家的 74 个地点进行,纳入了年龄≥18 岁、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)为 53-97mmol/mol(7.0-11.0%)、体重指数为 20-40kg/m²且正在接受 SGLT2 抑制剂±口服降糖药治疗但血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者,按 1:1 随机分为每日一次接受 IDegLira 或 IGlar U100 治疗的两组,两组均为现有治疗的附加治疗。主要终点为从基线到 26 周时 HbA1c 的变化。
共有 210 名参与者被随机分配到每组。IDegLira 组的平均 HbA1c 降低 21mmol/mol(1.9%),IGlar U100 组降低 18mmol/mol(1.7%);证实了非劣效性(P<0.0001)和 IDegLira 的优越性(HbA1c 变化差值-3.90mmol/mol;95%置信区间[CI]:-5.45;-2.35[-0.36%;95%CI:-0.50,-0.21])。IDegLira 也优于 IGlar U100:体重(差值-1.92kg;95%CI:-2.64,-1.19);严重或血糖确认的症状性低血糖(发生率比值 0.42;95%CI:0.23,0.75);总日胰岛素剂量(差值-15.37U;95%CI:-19.60,-11.13)。由于脂肪酶和恶心发生率升高,IDegLira 的总体治疗期不良事件发生率更高。
在接受 SGLT2 抑制剂治疗的血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,IDegLira 具有良好的安全性和疗效,与 IGlar U100 相比,体重增加和低血糖风险更低,这表明临床医生应考虑在该人群中起始 IDegLira 治疗。