de Botton Institute for Protein Profiling, The Nancy and Stephen Grand Israel National Center for Personalized Medicine , Weizmann Institute of Science , Rehovot 76100 , Israel.
J Proteome Res. 2019 Mar 1;18(3):1441-1445. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00891. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
The analysis of cells and tissue by bottom-up proteomics starts with lysis, followed by in-solution digestion. Lysis buffers commonly used include detergents and other reagents for achieving efficient protein solubility. However, these reagents are, for the most part, incompatible with downstream analytical instrumentation. One method for in-solution digestion and cleanup, termed suspension trapping (S-Trap), has been recently introduced. We present an evaluation of the compatibility of commonly used lysis buffers with S-Trap: SDS, urea, NP-40, RIPA, and SDS with DTT (SDT). We show that S-Trap is compatible with all of the tested buffers, with SDS and SDT performing the best. On the basis of these data, we anticipate that the method will transform experimental planning for mass-spectrometry-based proteomics, making it far more flexible and tolerable of various lysis buffers. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the data set identifier PXD011665.
通过自下而上的蛋白质组学分析细胞和组织,首先要进行裂解,然后进行溶液内消化。常用的裂解缓冲液包括用于实现高效蛋白质溶解度的去污剂和其他试剂。然而,这些试剂在很大程度上与下游分析仪器不兼容。最近引入了一种称为悬浮捕获(S-Trap)的溶液内消化和净化方法。我们评估了常用的裂解缓冲液与 S-Trap 的兼容性:SDS、尿素、NP-40、RIPA 和含 DTT 的 SDS(SDT)。我们表明,S-Trap 与所有测试的缓冲液都兼容,SDS 和 SDT 的效果最好。基于这些数据,我们预计该方法将改变基于质谱的蛋白质组学的实验规划,使其更加灵活,能够耐受各种裂解缓冲液。质谱蛋白质组学数据已通过 PRIDE 合作伙伴库被提交到 ProteomeXchange 联盟,数据集标识符为 PXD011665。