Schmidtbauer Kelly A, Russell Esposito E, Wilken Jason M
1 Center for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
2 Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Jun;43(3):316-324. doi: 10.1177/0309364619826386. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
Individuals with severe lower extremity injuries often require ankle-foot orthoses to return to normal activities. Ankle-foot orthoses alignment is a key consideration during the clinical fitting process and may be particularly important during dynamic activities such as running.
To investigate how 3° changes in sagittal plane ankle-foot orthoses alignment affect running mechanics.
Controlled laboratory study.
Twelve participants with unilateral lower limb injury ran overground and lower extremity running mechanics were assessed. Participants wore their passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses in three alignments: clinically fit neutral, 3° plantarflexed from clinically fit neutral, and 3° dorsiflexed from clinically fit neutral.
The 3° changes in sagittal alignment significantly influenced ankle mechanics during running. The plantarflexed alignment significantly decreased the peak ankle plantarflexor moment, peak knee extensor moment, and peak ankle and knee power absorption and generation compared to more dorsiflexed alignments. Alignment also altered footstrike angle, with dorsiflexed alignments associated with a more dorsiflexed footstrike pattern and plantarflexed alignments toward a more plantarflexed footstrike pattern. However, alignment did not influence loading rate.
Small changes in ankle-foot orthoses alignment significantly altered running mechanics, including footstrike angle, and knee extensor moments. Understanding how ankle-foot orthoses design parameters affect running mechanics may aid the development of evidence-based prescription guidelines and improve function for ankle-foot orthoses users who perform high-impact activities.
Understanding how ankle-foot orthoses alignment impacts biomechanics should be a consideration when fitting passive-dynamic devices for higher impact activities, such as running. Individual running styles, including footstrike patterns, may be affected by small changes in alignment.
下肢严重受伤的个体通常需要踝足矫形器才能恢复正常活动。踝足矫形器的对线是临床适配过程中的关键考虑因素,在跑步等动态活动中可能尤为重要。
研究矢状面踝足矫形器对线3°的变化如何影响跑步力学。
对照实验室研究。
12名单侧下肢受伤的参与者在地面上跑步,并评估下肢跑步力学。参与者穿着被动动力踝足矫形器,采用三种对线方式:临床适配中立位、从临床适配中立位跖屈3°、从临床适配中立位背屈3°。
矢状面对线3°的变化在跑步过程中显著影响踝关节力学。与背屈程度更大的对线相比,跖屈对线显著降低了踝关节跖屈肌峰值力矩、膝关节伸肌峰值力矩以及踝关节和膝关节的峰值功率吸收和产生。对线还改变了着地角度,背屈对线与更背屈的着地模式相关,跖屈对线则趋向于更跖屈的着地模式。然而,对线并未影响负荷率。
踝足矫形器对线的微小变化显著改变了跑步力学,包括着地角度和膝关节伸肌力矩。了解踝足矫形器设计参数如何影响跑步力学,可能有助于制定基于证据的处方指南,并改善从事高冲击活动的踝足矫形器使用者的功能。
在为跑步等高冲击活动适配被动动力装置时,应考虑了解踝足矫形器对线如何影响生物力学。个体跑步方式,包括着地模式,可能会受到对线微小变化的影响。