Department of Emergency Medicine, Wellspan York Hospital, York, PA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;26(8):921-930. doi: 10.1111/acem.13713. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of emergency physician-performed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction (SBO) compared to computed tomography (CT).
We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational study examining a convenience sample of adult patients with potential SBO presenting to the emergency department (ED) between July 2014 and May 2017. Each POCUS was interpreted at the bedside by the performing emergency physician and retrospectively by an expert reviewer. Test characteristics were calculated for POCUS, blinded expert interpretation, and specific POCUS parameters.
A total of 217 subjects were included in the primary analysis with an overall SBO prevalence of 42.9%. For the diagnosis of SBO, POCUS demonstrated an overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80 to 0.94), 0.54 (95% CI = 0.45 to 0.63), 1.92 (95% CI = 1.56 to 2.35), and 0.22 (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.39), respectively. Expert review yielded a similar sensitivity (0.89 [95% CI = 0.81 to 0.95]) with a significantly higher specificity (0.82 [95% CI = 0.74 to 0.88]). The more sensitive sonographic parameters for both POC sonographers and expert reviewers were small-bowel dilation ≥ 25 mm (0.87 [95% CI = 0.79 to 0.93], 0.87 [95% CI = 0.79 to 0.93]) and abnormal peristalsis (0.82 [95% CI = 0.72 to 0.89], 0.85 [95% CI = 0.76 to 0.87]). The more specific parameters for both groups were transition point (0.82 [95% CI = 0.74 to 0.89], 0.98 [95% CI = 0.94 to 1.00]), intraperitoneal free fluid (0.82 [95% CI = 0.74 to 0.89], 0.93 [95% CI = 0.87 to 0.97]), and bowel wall edema (0.76 [95% CI = 0.67 to 0.83], 0.93 [95% CI = 0.87 to 0.97]).
POCUS is moderately sensitive for SBO, although less specific, when performed by a diverse group of emergency physicians across multiple EDs. Interpretation of acquired POCUS images is significantly more accurate when performed by physicians with prior emergency ultrasound fellowship training and familiarity with the sonographic appearance of SBO.
本研究的主要目的是评估急诊医师即时进行床边超声检查(POCUS)诊断小肠梗阻(SBO)的准确性,与计算机断层扫描(CT)相比。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究,检查了 2014 年 7 月至 2017 年 5 月期间在急诊科就诊的疑似 SBO 的成年患者的便利样本。每份 POCUS 均由进行检查的急诊医师在床边进行解读,并由专家进行回顾性解读。计算了 POCUS、盲法专家解读和特定 POCUS 参数的检测特性。
共有 217 名患者纳入主要分析,总体 SBO 患病率为 42.9%。对于 SBO 的诊断,POCUS 的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为 0.88(95%置信区间[CI]:0.80 至 0.94)、0.54(95% CI:0.45 至 0.63)、1.92(95% CI:1.56 至 2.35)和 0.22(95% CI:0.12 至 0.39)。专家审查得出了相似的敏感性(0.89 [95% CI:0.81 至 0.95]),但特异性显著更高(0.82 [95% CI:0.74 至 0.88])。对于 POC 超声医师和专家审查员而言,更敏感的超声参数是小肠扩张≥25mm(0.87 [95% CI:0.79 至 0.93],0.87 [95% CI:0.79 至 0.93])和异常蠕动(0.82 [95% CI:0.72 至 0.89],0.85 [95% CI:0.76 至 0.87])。两组中更特异的参数是移行点(0.82 [95% CI:0.74 至 0.89],0.98 [95% CI:0.94 至 1.00])、腹腔游离液(0.82 [95% CI:0.74 至 0.89],0.93 [95% CI:0.87 至 0.97])和肠壁水肿(0.76 [95% CI:0.67 至 0.83],0.93 [95% CI:0.87 至 0.97])。
在多个急诊科由不同的急诊医师进行即时 POCUS 检查时,SBO 的敏感性适中,但特异性较低。具有急诊超声专业 fellowship培训背景和熟悉 SBO 超声表现的医师进行 POCUS 图像采集解读时,准确性显著提高。