• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎后路减压融合术:评估非家庭出院的风险因素以及处置方式对出院后结局的影响。

Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Assessing Risk Factors for Nonhome Discharge and the Impact of Disposition on Postdischarge Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e958-e965. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.214. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.214
PMID:30763752
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify predictors for postacute care facility discharge for patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) and to determine if discharge placement impacts postdischarge outcomes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing PCDF from 2012 to 2015 were queried from the NSQIP database (n = 8743) and separated by discharge placement. Outcomes included nonhome discharge, unplanned 30-day readmission, and adverse events (AEs), both before and after discharge. Demographics and comorbidities were analyzed using bivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for nonhome discharge, readmission, and severe AE after discharge.

RESULTS

Patients with nonhome discharges were significantly older (67.4 vs. 58.6 years; P < 0.001), sicker (82% vs. 54% American Society of Anesthesiologists >2; P < 0.001), and more functionally dependent (16% vs. 3.4%; P < 0.001), with a greater comorbidity burden. Patients with PCDF had an increased likelihood of nonhome discharge if they had a dependent functional status (odds ratio [OR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-3.82; P < 0.001), diabetes (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55; P = 0.0007), and an American Society of Anesthesiologists >2 (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.5-2.05; P < 0.001), as well as if they were older (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.06; P < 0.001) and female (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.5; P = 0.0002). Patients with PCDF with nonhome discharges had an increased likelihood of having a severe postdischarge AE (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.26-2.33; P = 0.0006) and an unplanned readmission (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.15-1.82; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that patients with PCDF discharged to a postacute care facility have a higher likelihood of having a severe AE after discharge as well as a higher likelihood of being readmitted.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定接受颈椎后路减压融合术(PCDF)患者转入急性后期护理机构的预测因素,并确定出院地点是否会影响出院后的结果。

方法

从 NSQIP 数据库(n=8743)中查询 2012 年至 2015 年接受 PCDF 的患者,并按出院地点进行分类。出院后的结果包括非家庭出院、30 天内计划外再入院和不良事件(AE)。使用双变量分析来分析人口统计学和合并症。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定非家庭出院、再入院和出院后严重 AE 的预测因素。

结果

非家庭出院患者的年龄明显较大(67.4 岁 vs. 58.6 岁;P < 0.001),病情较重(82% vs. 54%美国麻醉医师协会> 2;P < 0.001),功能依赖性更强(16% vs. 3.4%;P < 0.001),合并症负担更重。如果患者的功能状态依赖(比值比[OR],2.99;95%置信区间[CI],2.33-3.82;P < 0.001)、患有糖尿病(OR,1.32;95%CI,1.13-1.55;P=0.0007)和美国麻醉医师协会> 2(OR,1.75;95%CI,1.5-2.05;P < 0.001),或年龄较大(OR,1.06;95%CI,1.05-1.06;P < 0.001)和女性(OR,1.31;95%CI,1.14-1.5;P=0.0002),则 PCDF 患者更有可能非家庭出院。PCDF 非家庭出院患者发生严重出院后 AE(OR,1.71;95%CI,1.26-2.33;P=0.0006)和计划外再入院(OR,1.45;95%CI,1.15-1.82;P=0.002)的可能性更高。

结论

本横断面研究结果表明,转入急性后期护理机构的 PCDF 患者出院后发生严重 AE 的可能性更高,再入院的可能性也更高。

相似文献

1
Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Assessing Risk Factors for Nonhome Discharge and the Impact of Disposition on Postdischarge Outcomes.颈椎后路减压融合术:评估非家庭出院的风险因素以及处置方式对出院后结局的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e958-e965. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.214. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
2
Discharge Destination as a Predictor of Postoperative Outcomes and Readmission Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion.腰椎后路融合术后出院目的地作为术后结果和再入院的预测因素
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e139-e146. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.147. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
3
Discharge Destination After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Postdischarge Outcomes, Placement Risk Factors, and Recent Trends.全关节置换术后的出院目的地:出院后结局、安置风险因素及近期趋势分析
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.044. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
4
Discharge to Inpatient Care Facility After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Predictors, and Postdischarge Outcomes.前路腰椎间融合术后患者转入住院治疗机构的情况:发生率、预测因素和出院后结果。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e584-e590. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.108. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
5
Predictors of Discharge to a Nonhome Facility in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression Without Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease.退行性脊柱疾病行非融合腰椎减压术患者转至非家庭机构出院的预测因素
Neurosurgery. 2017 Oct 1;81(4):638-649. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx057.
6
Lumbar decompression in the elderly: increased age as a risk factor for complications and nonhome discharge.老年人腰椎减压术:年龄增长作为并发症和非家庭出院的危险因素
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Mar;26(3):353-362. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE16616. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
7
Nonhome Discharge as an Independent Risk Factor for Adverse Events and Readmission in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.非出院地作为行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术患者不良事件和再入院的独立危险因素。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;33(10):E454-E459. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000961.
8
Women undergoing aortic surgery are at higher risk for unplanned readmissions compared with men especially when discharged home.与男性相比,接受主动脉手术的女性再次入院的风险更高,尤其是在出院回家时。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jun;63(6):1496-1504.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.054. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Discharge Destination After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Postdischarge Outcomes and Placement Risk Factors.翻修全关节置换术后的出院目的地:出院后结局及安置风险因素分析
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9):1866-1872.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.053. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
10
Predictive Risk Factors of Nonhome Discharge Following Elective Posterior Cervical Fusion.择期后路颈椎融合术后非家庭出院的预测风险因素。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e574-e579. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.213. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity between Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Performed in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings.住院和门诊环境下颈椎后路减压融合术的30天再入院、再次手术及发病率的比较分析
Asian Spine J. 2023 Feb;17(1):75-85. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0523. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
2
The Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient Outcomes After Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.术前症状持续时间对颈椎后路减压融合术后患者预后的影响。
Global Spine J. 2023 Oct;13(8):2463-2470. doi: 10.1177/21925682221087735. Epub 2022 Mar 24.