Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;17(11):2277-2284. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.047. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Incomplete resection of polyps could be an important cause of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. However, it is difficult to study progression of incompletely removed polyps or their clinical importance. We aimed to estimate incomplete polyp resection using risk of metachronous neoplasia per colon segment.
We performed a retrospective study of 1031 patients (6186 colon segments) who initially underwent resection of a large (10-20 mm) neoplastic polyp at 2 academic medical centers (from 2000 through 2012) and then underwent a subsequent colonoscopy within 0.5 to 5 years. We determined the proportions of metachronous neoplasia in colon segments from which a single large neoplastic polyp was removed and in segments without prior neoplasia. We then used the absolute difference in proportions between these groups to estimate the rate of incomplete resection. Our analysis assumed that development of metachronous neoplasia in each colon segment was the consequence of a newly grown polyp, a previously missed polyp, or an incompletely removed polyp.
Metachronous neoplasia was detected in 177 of 757 segments (23.4%) with a single large polyp, and in 438 of 4232 segments (10.3%) without any neoplasia at baseline colonoscopy (P < .001). Resections were therefore estimated to be incomplete in 13.0% of segments (95% CI, 9.8-16.2). This proportion was greater for sections with non-pedunculated polyps (18.3%; 95% CI, 14.2-22.5) than pedunculated polyps (3.5%; 95% CI, -0.7 to -11.3; P < .001). A higher proportion of piecemeal resections appeared to be incomplete (28.0%; 95% CI, 20.2-35.7) than of en bloc resections (9.2%; 95% CI, 5.9-12.5) (P < .001). No differences in incomplete resection were associated with polyp histology.
Metachronous neoplasia arises in a significantly higher proportion of colon segments from which a polyp was previously removed. Based on these data, we estimate that 13% of all large polyps are incompletely resected and 18% of large non-pedunculated polyps are incompletely resected. These findings indicate that incomplete resection could be a risk factor for later development of neoplasia. Segment metachronous neoplasia might be used as a marker of resection quality.
息肉切除不完全可能是结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的一个重要原因。然而,研究未完全切除的息肉的进展或其临床意义是困难的。我们旨在使用每段结肠的继发肿瘤风险来估计息肉切除的不完全性。
我们对 2 所学术医疗中心的 1031 例患者(6186 个结肠段)进行了回顾性研究,这些患者最初在 2000 年至 2012 年期间接受了 10-20 毫米大的(大型)肿瘤性息肉切除术,然后在 0.5 至 5 年内进行了后续结肠镜检查。我们确定了单个大型肿瘤性息肉切除的结肠段与无基线结肠镜检查时肿瘤的结肠段之间继发肿瘤的比例。然后,我们使用这两组之间比例的绝对差异来估计不完全切除的比例。我们的分析假设,每个结肠段继发肿瘤的发生是新生长的息肉、以前遗漏的息肉或未完全切除的息肉的结果。
在有单个大息肉的 757 个段中有 177 个(23.4%)和在无任何基线结肠镜检查时肿瘤的 4232 个段中有 438 个(10.3%)检测到继发肿瘤(P<.001)。因此,估计有 13.0%(95%CI,9.8-16.2)的段为不完全切除。无蒂息肉的比例大于有蒂息肉(18.3%;95%CI,14.2-22.5 比 3.5%;95%CI,-0.7 至-11.3;P<.001)。似乎分片切除的比例较高(28.0%;95%CI,20.2-35.7)比整块切除的比例(9.2%;95%CI,5.9-12.5)高(P<.001)。息肉组织学与不完全切除无差异。
以前切除息肉的结肠段发生继发肿瘤的比例显著较高。根据这些数据,我们估计所有大息肉中有 13%未完全切除,所有大无蒂息肉中有 18%未完全切除。这些发现表明不完全切除可能是肿瘤发生的危险因素。节段性继发肿瘤可能作为切除质量的标志物。