• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 型糖尿病患儿的糖尿病技术报销在持续存在异质性:SWEET 视角。

Persistent heterogeneity in diabetes technology reimbursement for children with type 1 diabetes: The SWEET perspective.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Jun;20(4):434-443. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12833. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1111/pedi.12833
PMID:30773756
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frequent use of modern diabetes technologies increases the chance for optimal type 1 diabetes (T1D) control. Limited reimbursement influences the access of patients with T1D to these modalities and could worsen their prognosis. We aimed to describe the situation of reimbursement for insulins, glucometers, insulin pumps (CSII) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for children with T1D in European countries participating in the SWEET Project and to compare data from EU countries with data from our previous study in 2009.

METHODS

The study was conducted between March 2017 and August 2017. First, we approached diabetes technology companies with a survey to map the reimbursement of insulins and diabetic devices. The data collected from these companies were then validated by members of the SWEET consortium.

RESULTS

We collected data from 29 European countries, whereas all types of insulins are mostly fully covered, heterogeneity was observed regarding the reimbursement of strips for glucometers (from 90 strips/month to no limit). CSII is readily available in 20 of 29 countries. Seven countries reported significant quota issues or obstacles for CSII prescription, and two countries had no CSII reimbursement. CGM is at least partially reimbursed in 17 of 29 countries. The comparison with the 2009 study showed an increasing availability of CSII and CGM across the EU.

CONCLUSIONS

Although innovative diabetes technology is available, a large proportion of children with T1D still do not benefit from it due to its limited reimbursement.

摘要

背景

频繁使用现代糖尿病技术增加了实现 1 型糖尿病(T1D)最佳控制的机会。有限的报销会影响 T1D 患者获得这些治疗方式的机会,并可能使他们的预后恶化。我们旨在描述参与 SWEET 项目的欧洲国家中儿童 T1D 患者胰岛素、血糖仪、胰岛素泵(CSII)和连续血糖监测(CGM)报销的情况,并将欧盟国家的数据与我们 2009 年的研究数据进行比较。

方法

该研究于 2017 年 3 月至 2017 年 8 月进行。首先,我们向糖尿病技术公司发送了一份调查,以绘制胰岛素和糖尿病设备的报销情况。然后,SWEET 联盟的成员验证了从这些公司收集的数据。

结果

我们从 29 个欧洲国家收集了数据,虽然各种胰岛素大部分都得到了充分的覆盖,但血糖仪的试纸报销情况存在异质性(从每月 90 条到无限制)。29 个国家中有 20 个国家可以方便地使用 CSII。7 个国家报告了 CSII 处方的重大限额问题或障碍,2 个国家没有 CSII 报销。CGM 在 17 个国家至少部分报销。与 2009 年的研究相比,欧盟的 CSII 和 CGM 的可用性有所增加。

结论

尽管有创新的糖尿病技术,但由于报销限制,很大一部分 T1D 儿童仍无法从中受益。

相似文献

1
Persistent heterogeneity in diabetes technology reimbursement for children with type 1 diabetes: The SWEET perspective.1 型糖尿病患儿的糖尿病技术报销在持续存在异质性:SWEET 视角。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Jun;20(4):434-443. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12833. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
Variations in access to and reimbursement for continuous glucose monitoring systems for people living with Type 1 diabetes across England.英格兰1型糖尿病患者使用持续葡萄糖监测系统的机会及报销情况的差异。
Diabet Med. 2018 Nov;35(11):1617-1618. doi: 10.1111/dme.13766.
3
Treatment satisfaction and quality of life for an integrated continuous glucose monitoring/insulin pump system compared to self-monitoring plus an insulin pump.与自我血糖监测加胰岛素泵相比,一体化持续葡萄糖监测/胰岛素泵系统的治疗满意度和生活质量。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 1;3(6):1402-10. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300621.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the MiniMed 670G Hybrid Closed-Loop System Versus Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion for Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes.美敦力 670G 混合闭环系统与持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗 1 型糖尿病的成本效益分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Mar;21(3):110-118. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0328. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
Quality of Life and Glucose Control After 1 Year of Nationwide Reimbursement of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes (FUTURE): A Prospective Observational Real-World Cohort Study.1 型糖尿病患者接受间歇性扫描连续血糖监测 1 年后的生活质量和血糖控制(FUTURE):一项前瞻性观察性真实世界队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):389-397. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1610. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Sensor-Augmented Insulin Pump Therapy Versus Continuous Insulin Infusion in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes in Turkey.土耳其 1 型糖尿病患者使用传感器增强型胰岛素泵治疗与持续胰岛素输注的成本效益比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Dec;21(12):727-735. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0198. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Prolonged use of continuous glucose monitors in children with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or intensive multiple-daily injection therapy.在接受持续皮下胰岛素输注或强化每日多次注射治疗的1型糖尿病儿童中长时间使用持续葡萄糖监测仪。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Apr;10(2):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00476.x. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
8
A cost-effectiveness analysis of continuous subcutaneous insulin injection versus multiple daily injections in type 1 diabetes patients: a third-party US payer perspective.从第三方美国支付者角度评估 1 型糖尿病患者采用持续皮下胰岛素注射与多次皮下胰岛素注射的成本效果。
Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):674-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00478.x. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
9
Cost-effectiveness of the tandem t: Slim X2 with control-IQ technology automated insulin delivery system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Sweden.瑞典 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年使用 Slim X2 与控制-IQ 技术自动胰岛素输送系统的成本效益分析。
Diabet Med. 2024 Nov;41(11):e15432. doi: 10.1111/dme.15432. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
10
Optimization of insulin regimen and glucose outcomes with short-term real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) in type 1 diabetic children with sub-optimal glucose control on multiple daily injections: The pediatric DIACCOR study.在采用多次皮下注射治疗但血糖控制欠佳的1型糖尿病儿童中,通过短期实时动态血糖监测(RT-CGM)优化胰岛素治疗方案及血糖转归:儿科DIACCOR研究
Arch Pediatr. 2019 Feb;26(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2018.11.010. Epub 2019 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Inequities in Diabetes Technology and Insulin Access and Glycemic Outcomes.糖尿病技术、胰岛素获取及血糖结果方面的全球不平等现象。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2528933. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28933.
2
Barriers to Type 1 Diabetes Adherence in Adolescents.青少年1型糖尿病治疗依从性的障碍
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 24;13(19):5669. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195669.
3
Glucose metrics and device satisfaction in adults with type 1 diabetes using different treatment modalities: a multicenter, real-world observational study.
1型糖尿病成人患者使用不同治疗方式时的血糖指标与设备满意度:一项多中心、真实世界观察性研究
Acta Diabetol. 2025 Apr;62(4):563-573. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02381-3. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Comparisons of school-day glycemia in different settings for children with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring.使用连续血糖监测比较不同环境下 1 型糖尿病儿童的日间血糖水平。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2023;2023. doi: 10.1155/2023/8176606. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
5
The Evolution of Insulin Administration in Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病胰岛素给药的演变
J Diabetes Mellitus. 2021 Nov;11(5):249-277. doi: 10.4236/jdm.2021.115021. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
6
Socioeconomic status and diabetes technology use in youth with type 1 diabetes: a comparison of two funding models.社会经济地位与 1 型糖尿病青少年的糖尿病技术使用:两种资助模式的比较。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 21;14:1178958. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1178958. eCollection 2023.
7
Outcomes and experiences of families with children with type 1 diabetes on insulin pumps through subsidised pump access programs in Western Australia.在西澳大利亚州,通过补贴的胰岛素泵获取项目,患有 1 型糖尿病的儿童的家庭的结果和体验。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 8;14:1173559. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1173559. eCollection 2023.
8
Healthcare expenditure and technology use in pediatric diabetes care.儿科糖尿病护理中的医疗支出和技术使用。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2023 Apr 7;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01316-3.
9
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes technologies: Glucose monitoring.国际儿童青少年糖尿病研究学会(ISPAD)2022年临床实践共识指南:糖尿病技术:血糖监测
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1390-1405. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13451.
10
100 Years of Insulin: Lifesaver, immune target, and potential remedy for prevention.胰岛素百年:救命药、免疫靶点和预防潜在疗法。
Med. 2021 Oct 8;2(10):1120-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Sep 15.